van Beljouw Ilse M J, Heerings Marjolijn, Abma Tineke A, Laurant Miranda G H, Veer-Tazelaar Petronella J Van't, Baur Vivianne E, Stek Max L, van Marwijk Harm W J, Van Exel Eric
a Department of Psychiatry , VU University Medical Center/GGZ in Geest and EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(5):453-63. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2014.944090. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
Many older adults have significant depressive symptoms but few people access care for these. This study explores which personal, clinical and need factors facilitate or hinder acceptance of a new outreaching preference-led intervention programme.
From a sample of 9661 community-dwelling 65+ year olds, 244 persons with depressive symptoms according to the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 were included. Data on programme effectiveness in terms of care utilisation were collected. Associations between programme acceptance and personal, clinical and need factors were studied using quantitative (logistic regression analyses) and qualitative methods (semi-structured interviews with 26 subjects, who accepted (n = 20) or declined (n = 6) the programme).
Fifty-six per cent (n = 137) took part in the interventions. Quantitative logistic regression analyses showed that participants were more often female, suffered from more severe depressive symptoms and perceived more loneliness. Qualitative analyses revealed that people accepting the intervention programme felt that medical terms as having a depressed mood were applicable to their situation, more often perceived their symptoms as hindering, felt lonely and more often perceived a need for care. They were more often advised by their general practitioner to participate than individuals who refused the interventions. Many participating individuals did not see a match between the intervention programme and their needs, especially with respect to meeting new people.
Many older persons with depressive symptoms did not feel the need to take part in the programme. Providing support in alleviating loneliness and further adaptation to older adults' illness representations and perceptions when discussing depressive symptoms might enhance care utilisation.
许多老年人有明显的抑郁症状,但很少有人为此寻求治疗。本研究探讨了哪些个人、临床和需求因素促进或阻碍了对一项新的外展性偏好导向干预计划的接受。
从9661名65岁及以上社区居住老人的样本中,纳入了244名根据患者健康问卷-9有抑郁症状的人。收集了关于该计划在护理利用方面有效性的数据。使用定量方法(逻辑回归分析)和定性方法(对26名接受(n = 20)或拒绝(n = 6)该计划的受试者进行半结构化访谈)研究了计划接受度与个人、临床和需求因素之间的关联。
56%(n = 137)的人参加了干预。定量逻辑回归分析表明,参与者女性居多,患有更严重的抑郁症状,且感到更孤独。定性分析显示,接受干预计划的人认为诸如情绪低落等医学术语适用于他们的情况,更常认为自己的症状有阻碍作用,感到孤独,且更常认为需要护理。与拒绝干预的个体相比,他们更常得到全科医生的建议去参与。许多参与的个体认为干预计划与他们的需求不匹配,尤其是在结识新朋友方面。
许多有抑郁症状的老年人觉得没有必要参加该计划。在讨论抑郁症状时,提供支持以减轻孤独感,并进一步适应老年人对疾病的认知和看法,可能会提高护理利用率。