• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:南非开普敦泰格堡医院前50例病例回顾

Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: review of the first 50 cases at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

作者信息

Van der Merwe Andre, Heyns C F

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Tygerberg, Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr J Surg. 2014 Jun 6;52(2):53-6. doi: 10.7196/sajs.2080.

DOI:10.7196/sajs.2080
PMID:25216097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Changing from an open to a laparoscopic live renal donor programme poses challenges and may affect donor and graft outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate donor safety and graft outcomes for the first 50 retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomies performed at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.

METHODS

The procedures were performed by a single surgeon from 8 April 2008 to 3 April 2012. Operative and anatomical data were prospectively collected. A flank approach with lateral and posterior placements was used. Vascular control was achieved with Hem-o-lok clips in the majority of cases.

RESULTS

The mean age of the donors was 31.5 years (range 18 - 50), 28 (56.0%) were male, and the left kidney was harvested in 28 (56.0%) of cases. The mean operating time was 149.8 minutes (range 75 - 250), mean warm ischaemic time (WIT) 181.3 seconds (107 - 630), mean blood loss 139.7 ml (5 - 700) and mean hospital stay 3.2 days (2 - 5). Mean WIT was significantly longer for right-sided than left-sided nephrectomy (213 v. 162 seconds). In two right-sided cases the renal vein was too short and vena profunda femoris was used to create length. No donor received a blood transfusion. Comparing the last 25 with the first 25 cases showed a significant decrease in mean WIT (158 v. 204 seconds) and operating time (128 v. 172 minutes). No major complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Our initial 50 retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomies were performed without major complications. Donor safety was maintained during the early learning curve of the transition to minimal-access donor nephrectomy.

摘要

背景

从开放式活体肾供体手术方案转变为腹腔镜手术方案会带来挑战,且可能影响供体和移植肾的结局。

目的

评估在南非开普敦泰格堡医院进行的前50例后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的供体安全性和移植肾结局。

方法

手术由一名外科医生于2008年4月8日至2012年4月3日完成。前瞻性收集手术和解剖学数据。采用经侧方和后方放置的侧腹入路。大多数病例使用Hem-o-lok夹进行血管控制。

结果

供体的平均年龄为31.5岁(范围18 - 50岁),28例(56.0%)为男性,28例(56.0%)切除的是左肾。平均手术时间为149.8分钟(范围75 - 250分钟),平均热缺血时间(WIT)为181.3秒(107 - 630秒),平均失血量为139.7毫升(5 - 700毫升),平均住院时间为3.2天(2 - 5天)。右侧肾切除术的平均WIT明显长于左侧(213秒对162秒)。在两例右侧病例中,肾静脉过短,使用股深静脉来延长长度。没有供体接受输血。将最后25例与前25例进行比较,平均WIT(158秒对204秒)和手术时间(128分钟对172分钟)显著缩短。未发生重大并发症。

结论

我们最初的50例后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术未发生重大并发症。在向微创供肾切除术过渡的早期学习曲线期间,供体安全性得到了维持。

相似文献

1
Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: review of the first 50 cases at Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:南非开普敦泰格堡医院前50例病例回顾
S Afr J Surg. 2014 Jun 6;52(2):53-6. doi: 10.7196/sajs.2080.
2
Strategic hand assistance for effective and safe retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy.用于有效且安全的后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的策略性手辅助技术
Transplant Proc. 2009 Jan-Feb;41(1):88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.11.004.
3
Can right-sided hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy be advocated above standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized pilot study.右侧手辅助后腹腔镜供肾切除术是否比标准腹腔镜供肾切除术更具优势:一项随机试点研究。
Transpl Int. 2014 Feb;27(2):162-9. doi: 10.1111/tri.12226. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Washington Hospital Center experience.右侧腹腔镜供体肾切除术:华盛顿医院中心的经验
Urology. 2006 Dec;68(6):1175-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1076.
5
Robot-assisted laparoscopic and open live-donor nephrectomy: a comparison of donor morbidity and early renal allograft outcomes.机器人辅助腹腔镜与开放活体供肾肾切除术:供体并发症及早期肾移植结果的比较
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Feb;21(2):472-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfi150. Epub 2005 Oct 4.
6
Right laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a single institution experience.右侧腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:单中心经验
Transplantation. 2004 Feb 15;77(3):437-40. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000113230.90613.47.
7
Laparoscopic Live Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Outcomes Right Versus Left.腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术:右侧与左侧手术结果比较
Transplant Proc. 2018 Oct;50(8):2327-2332. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.03.034. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
8
Reluctance over right-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: justified or not?对右侧后腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的顾虑:合理与否?
Transplant Proc. 2007 Jun;39(5):1381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.02.069.
9
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: single-center experience in Egypt with 400 consecutive cases.腹腔镜供肾切除术:埃及单中心连续400例病例的经验
Transplant Proc. 2007 May;39(4):807-10. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.03.080.
10
Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: initial 44 cases.手辅助后腹腔镜肾切除术用于活体肾移植:初步44例报告
Urology. 2004 Aug;64(2):250-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.03.043.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: Challenges, Outcomes and Success Strategies.腹腔镜供肾切除术简介:挑战、结果与成功策略
Int J Organ Transplant Med. 2021;12(1):23-31.
2
Staplers or clips?: A systematic review and meta-analysis of vessel controlling devices for renal pedicle ligation in laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.吻合器还是夹子?:腹腔镜活体供肾肾切除术肾蒂结扎血管控制装置的系统评价和荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Nov;97(45):e13116. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013116.