• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生与贸易及投资协定的政策空间。

Policy space for health and trade and investment agreements.

作者信息

Koivusalo Meri

机构信息

National Institute for Health and Welfare, PO Box 30, Helsinki FI 00271, Finland.

出版信息

Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl 1:i29-47. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau033.

DOI:10.1093/heapro/dau033
PMID:25217355
Abstract

New trade agreements affect how governments can regulate for health both within health systems and in addressing health protection, promotion and social determinants of health in other policies. It is essential that those responsible for health understand the impacts of these trade negotiations and agreements on policy space for health at a national and local level. While we know more about implications from negotiations concerning intellectual property rights and trade in goods, this paper provides a screening checklist for less-discussed areas of domestic regulation, services, investment and government procurement. As implications are likely to differ on the basis of the organization and structures of national health systems and policy priorities, the emphasis is on finding out key provisions as well as on how exemptions and exclusions can be used to ensure policy space for health.

摘要

新的贸易协定影响着政府在卫生系统内部以及在其他政策中解决卫生保护、促进和健康的社会决定因素方面进行卫生监管的方式。负责卫生工作的人员必须了解这些贸易谈判和协定对国家和地方层面卫生政策空间的影响。虽然我们对知识产权和货物贸易谈判的影响了解得更多,但本文为国内监管、服务、投资和政府采购等较少讨论的领域提供了一份筛查清单。由于影响可能因国家卫生系统的组织和结构以及政策重点而异,重点在于找出关键条款以及如何利用豁免和排除规定来确保卫生政策空间。

相似文献

1
Policy space for health and trade and investment agreements.卫生与贸易及投资协定的政策空间。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl 1:i29-47. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau033.
2
Health in All (Foreign) Policy: challenges in achieving coherence.全民健康(对外)政策:实现协调一致面临的挑战。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl 1:i48-58. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau031.
3
Global trade and health: key linkages and future challenges.全球贸易与健康:关键联系及未来挑战。
Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(4):521-34.
4
The World Trade Organization: implications for health policy.世界贸易组织:对卫生政策的影响。
Med Confl Surviv. 2000 Apr-Jun;16(2):175-91. doi: 10.1080/13623690008409512.
5
Monitoring the impacts of trade agreements on food environments.监测贸易协定对食品环境的影响。
Obes Rev. 2013 Oct;14 Suppl 1:120-34. doi: 10.1111/obr.12081.
6
Analyzing the impact of trade and investment agreements on pharmaceutical policy: provisions, pathways and potential impacts.分析贸易和投资协定对药品政策的影响:规定、途径和潜在影响。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 28;15(Suppl 1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0518-2.
7
The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:它对健康的影响是否如我们所担心的那样?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2016 Aug 1;5(8):487-496. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.41.
8
International trade agreements: hazards to health?国际贸易协定:对健康的危害?
Int J Health Serv. 2004;34(3):467-81. doi: 10.2190/FB79-G25U-DWGK-C3QK.
9
International trade agreements: a threat to tobacco control policy.国际贸易协定:对烟草控制政策的一种威胁。
Tob Control. 2005 Aug;14 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii19-25. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.007930.
10
Is health impact assessment useful in the context of trade negotiations? A case study of the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement.健康影响评估在贸易谈判背景下是否有用?跨太平洋伙伴关系协定的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 4;6(4):e010339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010339.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy space and pro-health equity national policymaking: a case study of Myanmar during political transition (2006-16).政策空间与促进健康公平的国家决策制定:缅甸政治转型期间的案例研究(2006-2016 年)。
Health Policy Plan. 2023 Feb 13;38(2):170-180. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac076.
2
When actions do not match aspirations - comparison of the European Union policy claims against what has been negotiated for health services, trade and investment.当行动与愿望不符——比较欧盟政策主张与已就卫生服务、贸易和投资进行谈判的内容。
Global Health. 2021 Aug 30;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00739-8.
3
Policy Action Within Urban African Food Systems to Promote Healthy Food Consumption: A Realist Synthesis in Ghana and Kenya.
促进城市非洲食品系统中健康食品消费的政策行动:加纳和肯尼亚的现实主义综合研究。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):828-844. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.255.
4
The World Health Organization, Corporate Power, and the Prevention and Management of Conflicts of Interest in Nutrition Policy Comment on "Towards Preventing and Managing Conflict of Interest in Nutrition Policy? An Analysis of Submissions to a Consultation on a Draft WHO Tool".世界卫生组织、企业权力与营养政策中利益冲突的预防和管理 述评:“预防和管理营养政策中的利益冲突?对世卫组织一份工具草案磋商意见提交书的分析”。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Feb 1;11(2):228-232. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.156.
5
Defining the commercial determinants of health: a systematic review.定义健康的商业决定因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):1022. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09126-1.
6
The relationship between joining a US free trade agreement and processed food sales, 2002-2016: a comparative interrupted time-series analysis.2002-2016 年加入美国自由贸易协定与加工食品销售之间的关系:一项比较性中断时间序列分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jun;23(9):1609-1617. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019003999. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
7
Analyzing the impacts of global trade and investment on non-communicable diseases and risk factors: a critical review of methodological approaches used in quantitative analyses.分析全球贸易和投资对非传染性疾病和风险因素的影响:对定量分析中使用的方法学方法的批判性回顾。
Global Health. 2018 May 24;14(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0371-8.
8
International trade and investment law: a new framework for public health and the common good.国际贸易与投资法:公共卫生与共同利益的新框架。
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 8;18(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5486-6.
9
Advancing Public Health on the Changing Global Trade and Investment Agenda Comment on "The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Is It Everything We Feared for Health?".推进变化中的全球贸易和投资议程中的公共卫生事业——评《跨太平洋伙伴关系协定:是否如我们所担心的那样影响健康?》
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 1;6(5):295-298. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.129.