Vadu Rural Health Program, King Edward Memorial Hospital Research Center, Pune, India.
Centre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Infect. 2015 Feb;70(2):160-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.08.015. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
The global burden of influenza is increasingly recognized, but data from India remain sparse. We conducted a multi-site population-based surveillance study to estimate and compare rates of influenza-associated hospitalization at two rural Indian health and demographic surveillance system (HDSS) sites at Ballabgarh and Vadu during 2010-2012.
Prospective facility-based surveillance for all hospitalizations (excluding those for trauma, elective surgery and obstetric, ophthalmic or psychiatric reasons) was conducted at 72 health facilities. After collection of clinical details, patients had nasopharyngeal swabs taken and tested by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for influenza viruses. Annual healthcare utilization surveys (HUS) were conducted in HDSS households to identify proportion of hospitalizations occurring at non-study facilities to adjust for hospitalizations missed through facility-based surveillance.
HUS showed that 69% and 67% of hospitalizations occurred at study facilities at Ballabgarh and Vadu, respectively. Overall, 6004 patients hospitalized with acute medical illness at participating facilities were enrolled (1717 from Ballabgarh; 4287 from Vadu). The proportion of patients with influenza was higher at Vadu than Ballabgarh annually (2010: 21% vs. 5%, p < 0.05; 2011: 18% vs. 5%, p < 0.05; 2012: 23% vs. 5%, p < 0.05). Annual adjusted influenza-associated hospitalization rates were 5-11 fold higher in Vadu (20.3-51.6 per 10,000) vs Ballabgarh (4.4-6.3 per 10,000). At both sites, influenza A/H1N1pdm09 and B predominated during 2010, A/H3N2 and B during 2011, and A/H1N1pdm09 and B during 2012.
The markedly different influenza hospitalization rates by season and across communities in India highlight the need for sustained multi-site surveillance system for estimating national influenza disease burden. That would be the first step for initiating discussions around Influenza prevention and control strategies in the country.
流感的全球负担日益受到重视,但来自印度的数据仍然很少。我们在 2010 年至 2012 年期间在巴拉加尔和瓦杜两个农村印度健康和人口监测系统(HDSS)地点进行了一项多地点基于人群的监测研究,以估计和比较流感相关住院率。
在 72 个卫生设施中对所有(不包括创伤、择期手术和产科、眼科或精神科原因)住院进行前瞻性基于设施的监测。收集临床详细信息后,对患者进行鼻咽拭子采集,并通过逆转录聚合酶链反应检测流感病毒。在 HDSS 家庭中进行年度医疗保健利用调查(HUS),以确定在非研究设施发生的住院率,以调整通过基于设施的监测错过的住院率。
HUS 显示,巴拉加尔和瓦杜的住院率分别为 69%和 67%。总体而言,在参与设施中因急性医疗疾病住院的 6004 名患者被纳入研究(巴拉加尔 1717 名;瓦杜 4287 名)。每年流感患者在瓦杜的比例高于巴拉加尔(2010 年:21%比 5%,p<0.05;2011 年:18%比 5%,p<0.05;2012 年:23%比 5%,p<0.05)。瓦杜(20.3-51.6/10000)的年调整流感相关住院率是巴拉加尔(4.4-6.3/10000)的 5-11 倍。在这两个地点,2010 年 A/H1N1pdm09 和 B 占主导地位,2011 年 A/H3N2 和 B 占主导地位,2012 年 A/H1N1pdm09 和 B 占主导地位。
印度不同季节和社区流感住院率的显著差异突出表明需要建立持续的多地点监测系统来估计全国流感疾病负担。这将是围绕该国流感预防和控制策略展开讨论的第一步。