Pedersen Mads Møller, Pihl Michael Johannes, Haugaard Per, Hansen Kristoffer Lindskov, Lange Theis, Lönn Lars, Nielsen Michael Bachmann, Jensen Jørgen Arendt
Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Center for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, Department of Electrical Engeneering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2014 Nov;40(11):2700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.06.001. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
Abnormal blood flow is usually assessed using spectral Doppler estimation of the peak systolic velocity. The technique, however, only estimates the axial velocity component, and therefore the complexity of blood flow remains hidden in conventional ultrasound examinations. With the vector ultrasound technique transverse oscillation the blood velocities of both the axial and the transverse directions are obtained and the complexity of blood flow can be visualized. The aim of the study was to determine the technical performance and interpretation of vector concentration as a tool for estimation of flow complexity. A secondary aim was to establish accuracy parameters to detect flow changes/patterns in the common carotid artery (CCA) and the carotid bulb (CB). The right carotid bifurcation including the CCA and CB of eight healthy volunteers were scanned in a longitudinal plane with vector flow ultrasound (US) using a commercial vector flow ultrasound scanner (ProFocus, BK Medical, Denmark) with a linear 5 MHz transducer transverse oscillation vector flow software. CCA and CB areas were marked in one cardiac cycle from each volunteer. The complex flow was assessed by medical expert evaluation and by vector concentration calculation. A vortex with complex flow was found in all carotid bulbs, whereas the CCA had mainly laminar flow. The medical experts evaluated the flow to be mainly laminar in the CCA (0.82 ± 0.14) and mainly complex (0.23 ± 0.22) in the CB. Likewise, the estimated vector concentrations in CCA (0.96 ± 0.16) indicated mainly laminar flow and in CB (0.83 ± 0.07) indicated mainly turbulence. Both methods were thus able to clearly distinguish the flow patterns of CCA and CB in systole. Vector concentration from angle-independent vector velocity estimates is a quantitative index, which is simple to calculate and can differentiate between laminar and complex flow.
异常血流通常采用频谱多普勒估计收缩期峰值速度来评估。然而,该技术仅估计轴向速度分量,因此在传统超声检查中血流的复杂性仍然难以显现。使用矢量超声技术的横向振荡,可以获取轴向和横向两个方向的血流速度,从而使血流的复杂性得以可视化。本研究的目的是确定矢量浓度作为估计血流复杂性工具的技术性能及解读方法。第二个目的是建立用于检测颈总动脉(CCA)和颈动脉球部(CB)血流变化/模式的准确性参数。使用配备线性5MHz换能器横向振荡矢量流软件的商用矢量流超声扫描仪(ProFocus,BK Medical,丹麦),在纵向平面上对8名健康志愿者的右侧颈动脉分叉处(包括CCA和CB)进行矢量流超声(US)扫描。在每个志愿者的一个心动周期内标记CCA和CB区域。通过医学专家评估和矢量浓度计算来评估复杂血流。在所有颈动脉球部均发现了具有复杂血流的涡流,而CCA主要为层流。医学专家评估CCA的血流主要为层流(0.82±0.14),CB的血流主要为复杂血流(0.23±0.22)。同样,CCA中估计的矢量浓度(0.96±0.16)表明主要为层流,CB中(0.83±0.07)表明主要为湍流。因此,两种方法都能够清楚地区分收缩期CCA和CB中的血流模式。基于与角度无关的矢量速度估计得出的矢量浓度是一个定量指标,计算简单,能够区分层流和复杂血流。