Berndl Anne, El-Chaar Darine, Murphy Kellie, McDonald Sarah
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton ON.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto ON.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Aug;36(8):678-687. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30509-0.
Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter before induction of labour is a common obstetrical intervention. In this study we aimed to evaluate primarily the relationship between high or low volume Foley catheters used for cervical ripening and Caesarean section, and secondarily the relationship between Foley catheter volume, cervical ripeness, and time to delivery. We searched Medline and Embase from their inceptions with the assistance of an experienced librarian. All abstracts and complete articles were independently reviewed by two reviewers, according to predefined inclusion criteria. Six hundred forty-eight abstracts were identified, and 30 complete articles were read in full. Three articles with a total of 575 participating women met the inclusion criteria. The rate of Caesarean section with use of 80 mL Foley catheters was not significantly different from the rate using 30 mL Foley catheters (RR 0.82; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.41). A favourable cervix (which was defined heterogeneously) was more common with high volume catheters (RR 1.72; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.04), and failure to deliver in 24 hours was lower (RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.90). High volume Foley catheters improve the likelihood of a favourable cervix and chance of delivery in 24 hours more than low volume Foley catheters. As a more favourable cervix before induction of labour is associated with a lower rate of Caesarean section, a randomized controlled trial comparing high and low volume Foley catheters for cervical ripening using Caesarean section as the primary outcome is warranted.
引产前行Foley导管促宫颈成熟是一种常见的产科干预措施。在本研究中,我们主要旨在评估用于促宫颈成熟的大容量或小容量Foley导管与剖宫产之间的关系,其次评估Foley导管容量、宫颈成熟度和分娩时间之间的关系。在一位经验丰富的图书馆员的协助下,我们检索了自创建以来的Medline和Embase数据库。所有摘要和全文均由两名审阅者根据预先定义的纳入标准独立审阅。共识别出648篇摘要,并全文阅读了30篇完整文章。三篇共纳入575名参与女性的文章符合纳入标准。使用80 mL Foley导管的剖宫产率与使用30 mL Foley导管的剖宫产率无显著差异(相对风险0.82;95%置信区间0.48至1.41)。大容量导管更常出现有利的宫颈情况(定义不统一)(相对风险1.72;95%置信区间1.46至2.04),且24小时内未分娩的情况较少(相对风险0.70;95%置信区间0.54至0.90)。与小容量Foley导管相比,大容量Foley导管更有可能出现有利的宫颈情况以及在24小时内分娩。由于引产时更有利的宫颈情况与较低的剖宫产率相关,因此有必要进行一项以剖宫产作为主要结局的随机对照试验,比较大容量和小容量Foley导管用于促宫颈成熟的效果。