Septimus Edward J, Hayden Mary K, Kleinman Ken, Avery Taliser R, Moody Julia, Weinstein Robert A, Hickok Jason, Lankiewicz Julie, Gombosev Adrijana, Haffenreffer Katherine, Kaganov Rebecca E, Jernigan John A, Perlin Jonathan B, Platt Richard, Huang Susan S
Hospital Corporation of America, Nashville, Tennessee.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Oct;35 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S17-22. doi: 10.1086/677822.
To determine rates of blood culture contamination comparing 3 strategies to prevent intensive care unit (ICU) infections: screening and isolation, targeted decolonization, and universal decolonization.
Pragmatic cluster-randomized trial.
Forty-three hospitals with 74 ICUs; 42 of 43 were community hospitals.
Patients admitted to adult ICUs from July 1, 2009, to September 30, 2011.
After a 6-month baseline period, hospitals were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 strategies, with all participating adult ICUs in a given hospital assigned to the same strategy. Arm 1 implemented methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares screening and isolation, arm 2 targeted decolonization (screening, isolation, and decolonization of MRSA carriers), and arm 3 conducted no screening but universal decolonization of all patients with mupirocin and chlorhexidine (CHG) bathing. Blood culture contamination rates in the intervention period were compared to the baseline period across all 3 arms.
During the 6-month baseline period, 7,926 blood cultures were collected from 3,399 unique patients: 1,099 sets in arm 1, 928 in arm 2, and 1,372 in arm 3. During the 18-month intervention period, 22,761 blood cultures were collected from 9,878 unique patients: 3,055 sets in arm 1, 3,213 in arm 2, and 3,610 in arm 3. Among all individual draws, for arms 1, 2, and 3, the contamination rates were 4.1%, 3.9%, and 3.8% for the baseline period and 3.3%, 3.2%, and 2.4% for the intervention period, respectively. When we evaluated sets of blood cultures rather than individual draws, the contamination rate in arm 1 (screening and isolation) was 9.8% (N = 108 sets) in the baseline period and 7.5% (N = 228) in the intervention period. For arm 2 (targeted decolonization), the baseline rate was 8.4% (N = 78) compared to 7.5% (N = 241) in the intervention period. Arm 3 (universal decolonization) had the greatest decrease in contamination rate, with a decrease from 8.7% (N = 119) contaminated blood cultures during the baseline period to 5.1% (N = 184) during the intervention period. Logistic regression models demonstrated a significant difference across the arms when comparing the reduction in contamination between baseline and intervention periods in both unadjusted (P = .02) and adjusted (P = .02) analyses. Arm 3 resulted in the greatest reduction in blood culture contamination rates, with an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.044-0.71) and an adjusted OR of 0.55 (95% CI, 0.43-0.71).
In this large cluster-randomized trial, we demonstrated that universal decolonization with CHG bathing resulted in a significant reduction in blood culture contamination.
比较三种预防重症监护病房(ICU)感染的策略,即筛查与隔离、目标性去定植和普遍性去定植,以确定血培养污染率。
实用型整群随机试验。
43家医院的74个ICU;43家医院中有42家为社区医院。
2009年7月1日至2011年9月30日入住成人ICU的患者。
在为期6个月的基线期后,医院被随机分配至三种策略中的一种,同一医院内所有参与的成人ICU被分配至相同策略。第1组实施耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)鼻腔筛查与隔离,第2组进行目标性去定植(MRSA携带者的筛查、隔离和去定植),第3组不进行筛查,但对所有患者使用莫匹罗星和氯己定(CHG)沐浴进行普遍性去定植。将所有三组在干预期的血培养污染率与基线期进行比较。
在为期6个月的基线期内,从3399例不同患者中采集了7926份血培养样本:第1组1099份,第2组928份,第3组1372份。在为期18个月的干预期内,从9878例不同患者中采集了22761份血培养样本:第1组3055份,第2组3213份,第3组3610份。在所有单独采集样本中,第1、2、3组在基线期的污染率分别为4.1%、3.9%和3.8%,在干预期分别为3.3%、3.2%和2.4%。当我们评估血培养样本组而非单独采集样本时,第1组(筛查与隔离)在基线期的污染率为9.8%(N = 108组),在干预期为7.5%(N = 228组)。对于第2组(目标性去定植),基线率为8.4%(N = 78),干预期为7.5%(N = 241)。第3组(普遍性去定植)的污染率下降幅度最大,从基线期血培养污染率的8.7%(N = 119)降至干预期的5.1%(N = 184)。逻辑回归模型显示,在未调整(P = .02)和调整(P = .02)分析中,比较基线期和干预期污染率的降低情况时,三组之间存在显著差异。第3组导致血培养污染率降低幅度最大,未调整的优势比(OR)为0.56(95%置信区间[CI],0.044 - 0.71),调整后的OR为0.55(95% CI,0.43 - 0.71)。
在这项大型整群随机试验中,我们证明使用CHG沐浴进行普遍性去定植可显著降低血培养污染率。