• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

洗必泰沐浴对降低医学重症监护病房患者导管相关血流感染的有效性。

Effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections in medical intensive care unit patients.

作者信息

Bleasdale Susan C, Trick William E, Gonzalez Ines M, Lyles Rosie D, Hayden Mary K, Weinstein Robert A

机构信息

Department of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2073-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2073.

DOI:10.1001/archinte.167.19.2073
PMID:17954801
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients bathed daily with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) have a lower incidence of primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) compared with patients bathed with soap and water.

METHODS

The study design was a 52-week, 2-arm, crossover (ie, concurrent control group) clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis. The study setting was the 22-bed medical intensive care unit (MICU), which comprises 2 geographically separate, similar 11-bed units, of the John H. Stroger Jr (Cook County) Hospital, a 464-bed public teaching hospital in Chicago, Illinois. The study population comprised 836 MICU patients. During the first of 2 study periods (28 weeks), 1 hospital unit was randomly selected to serve as the intervention unit in which patients were bathed daily with 2% CHG-impregnated washcloths (Sage 2% CHG cloths; Sage Products Inc, Cary, Illinois); patients in the concurrent control unit were bathed daily with soap and water. After a 2-week wash-out period at the end of the first period, cleansing methods were crossed over for 24 more weeks. Main outcome measures included incidences of primary BSIs and clinical (culture-negative) sepsis (primary outcomes) and incidences of other infections (secondary outcomes).

RESULTS

Patients in the CHG intervention arm were significantly less likely to acquire a primary BSI (4.1 vs 10.4 infections per 1000 patient days; incidence difference, 6.3 [95% confidence interval, 1.2-11.0). The incidences of other infections, including clinical sepsis, were similar between the units. Protection against primary BSI by CHG cleansing was apparent after 5 or more days in the MICU.

CONCLUSION

Daily cleansing of MICU patients with CHG-impregnated cloths is a simple, effective strategy to decrease the rate of primary BSIs.

摘要

目的

确定与使用肥皂和水沐浴的患者相比,每天使用葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)沐浴的患者原发性血流感染(BSI)的发生率是否更低。

方法

本研究设计为一项为期52周、双臂、交叉(即同期对照组)的临床试验,并进行意向性分析。研究地点为约翰·H·斯特罗格 Jr(库克县)医院的22张床位的医学重症监护病房(MICU),该医院位于伊利诺伊州芝加哥,是一家拥有464张床位的公立教学医院,MICU由两个地理位置分开、类似的11张床位的单元组成。研究人群包括836名MICU患者。在两个研究期的第一个阶段(28周),随机选择1个医院单元作为干预单元,该单元的患者每天使用浸有2%CHG的 washcloths(Sage 2%CHG cloths;Sage Products Inc,伊利诺伊州卡里)沐浴;同期对照单元的患者每天使用肥皂和水沐浴。在第一个阶段结束时经过2周的洗脱期后,清洁方法再交叉使用24周。主要结局指标包括原发性BSI和临床(血培养阴性)脓毒症的发生率(主要结局)以及其他感染的发生率(次要结局)。

结果

CHG干预组的患者发生原发性BSI的可能性显著降低(每1000患者日4.1例感染 vs 10.4例感染;发生率差异为6.3[95%置信区间,1.2 - 11.0])。各单元之间其他感染(包括临床脓毒症)的发生率相似。在MICU中,使用CHG清洁5天或更长时间后,对原发性BSI的防护作用明显。

结论

每天用浸有CHG的布清洁MICU患者是降低原发性BSI发生率的一种简单、有效的策略。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections in medical intensive care unit patients.洗必泰沐浴对降低医学重症监护病房患者导管相关血流感染的有效性。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22;167(19):2073-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2073.
2
Effectiveness of routine patient cleansing with chlorhexidine gluconate for infection prevention in the medical intensive care unit.在医疗重症监护病房中,使用葡萄糖酸氯己定进行常规患者清洁以预防感染的有效性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;30(10):959-63. doi: 10.1086/605925.
3
Chlorhexidine bathing to reduce central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infection: impact and sustainability.氯己定沐浴以减少中心静脉导管相关血流感染:影响和可持续性。
Am J Med. 2012 May;125(5):505-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.10.032.
4
Daily skin cleansing with chlorhexidine did not reduce the rate of central-line associated bloodstream infection in a surgical intensive care unit.在外科重症监护病房,每天用洗必泰进行皮肤清洁并未降低中心静脉导管相关血流感染的发生率。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 May;36(5):854-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1783-y. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
5
Effect of chlorhexidine whole-body bathing on hospital-acquired infections among trauma patients.洗必泰全身沐浴对创伤患者医院获得性感染的影响。
Arch Surg. 2010 Mar;145(3):240-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2010.5.
6
Chlorhexidine gluconate to cleanse patients in a medical intensive care unit: the effectiveness of source control to reduce the bioburden of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.使用葡萄糖酸氯己定对医学重症监护病房的患者进行清洁:源头控制对降低耐万古霉素肠球菌生物负荷的有效性。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Feb 13;166(3):306-12. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.3.306.
7
Impact of chlorhexidine bathing on hospital-acquired infections among general medical patients.氯己定沐浴对普通内科患者医院获得性感染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;32(3):238-43. doi: 10.1086/658334.
8
Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: impact on central line-associated bloodstream infections.在三级医疗新生儿重症监护病房进行洗必泰沐浴:对中心静脉导管相关血流感染的影响
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):158-63. doi: 10.1086/674862. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
9
Chlorhexidine daily bathing: impact on health care-associated infections caused by gram-negative bacteria.每日使用洗必泰沐浴:对革兰氏阴性菌引起的医疗保健相关感染的影响
Am J Infect Control. 2015 Jun;43(6):640-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
10
Chlorhexidine bathing and health care-associated infections: a randomized clinical trial.氯己定沐浴与医疗保健相关感染:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):369-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.18400.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different disinfectants on preventing asymptomatic bacteriuria and catheter-related urinary tract infection: a network meta-analysis.不同消毒剂对预防无症状菌尿和导管相关尿路感染的影响:一项网状Meta分析
Front Urol. 2023 Oct 13;3:1173885. doi: 10.3389/fruro.2023.1173885. eCollection 2023.
2
Prospective, crossover, comparative study of two methods of chlorhexidine bathing.洗必泰沐浴两种方法的前瞻性、交叉、对照研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 30;46(3):1-6. doi: 10.1017/ice.2024.243.
3
Implementation of 2% Chlorhexidine Bathing to Reduce Healthcare-Associated Infections Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit.
实施2%洗必泰沐浴以减少重症监护病房患者的医疗相关感染。
Microorganisms. 2025 Jan 2;13(1):65. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13010065.
4
A multicentric survey and single-centre observational study of usage behaviour of sinks in intensive care: training is needed to minimize risk.多中心调查和单中心观察研究:重症监护病房水槽使用行为——需要培训以最小化风险。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Nov 17;13(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01493-3.
5
Skin decontamination to prevent infections in the intensive care unit.皮肤去污以预防重症监护病房的感染。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):2144-2145. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07701-3. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
6
EFFECT of daily antiseptic bathing with octenidine on ICU-acquired bacteremia and ICU-acquired multidrug-resistant organisms: a multicenter, cluster-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study.每天用奥替尼定进行抗菌沐浴对 ICU 获得性菌血症和 ICU 获得性多药耐药菌的影响:一项多中心、集群随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2024 Dec;50(12):2073-2082. doi: 10.1007/s00134-024-07667-2. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
7
Rebound Inverts the Bacteremia Prevention Effect of Antibiotic Based Decontamination Interventions in ICU Cohorts with Prolonged Length of Stay.在住院时间延长的重症监护病房队列中,反弹逆转了基于抗生素去污干预措施预防菌血症的效果。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2024 Mar 29;13(4):316. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13040316.
8
Impact of measurement and feedback on chlorhexidine gluconate bathing among intensive care unit patients: A multicenter study.测量和反馈对重症监护病房患者使用葡萄糖酸洗必泰沐浴的影响:一项多中心研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1375-1380. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.177. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
9
Central-line associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units before and after implementation of daily antiseptic bathing with chlorhexidine or octenidine: a post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.集束化干预策略降低 ICU 中心静脉导管相关血流感染的多中心随机对照研究
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2023 Jun 3;12(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13756-023-01260-w.
10
Bacterial colonisation and the effect of a cleaning regime on iPad patient side electronic devices used in a veterinary healthcare setting.兽医医疗环境中 iPad 患者侧电子设备的细菌定植及清洁方案效果
J Feline Med Surg. 2023 May;25(5):1098612X231169231. doi: 10.1177/1098612X231169231.