Nathou Clement, Etard Olivier, Simon Gregory, Dollfus Sonia
CHU de Caen, Service de psychiatrie, Centre Esquirol, Caen, France; UCBN, UFR de Médecine, Caen, France; CNRS, UMR 6301, ISTCT, ISTS Group, GIP Cyceron, Caen, France.
Psychophysiology. 2015 Feb;52(2):192-8. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12323. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Few studies have examined the impact of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the cortical excitability of nonmotor cortices; current treatments often target the temporal or prefrontal cortex. We used auditory evoked potentials recorded in 24 healthy subjects to evaluate the neuromodulatory effects of low- and high-frequency rTMS in the temporal lobe. Both auditory evoked potential P50 amplitude, a marker of cortical excitability, and P50 ratio, a marker of sensory gating known to be impaired in patients with auditory verbal hallucinations, were compared before and after rTMS. We observed a similar effect after both stimulation frequencies, with a decrease in P50 amplitude and no significant effect on P50 ratio. Low- and high-frequency rTMS applied to the temporal lobe seemed to exert the same cortical neuromodulation effect, while auditory sensory gating may not be modulated by temporal rTMS.
很少有研究考察重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对非运动皮层皮质兴奋性的影响;目前的治疗通常针对颞叶或前额叶皮层。我们利用在24名健康受试者身上记录的听觉诱发电位来评估低频和高频rTMS在颞叶中的神经调节作用。在rTMS前后,对作为皮质兴奋性标志物的听觉诱发电位P50波幅以及作为感觉门控标志物且已知在伴有幻听的患者中受损的P50比率进行了比较。我们在两种刺激频率后都观察到了类似的效应,即P50波幅降低,而对P50比率无显著影响。应用于颞叶的低频和高频rTMS似乎发挥了相同的皮质神经调节作用,而听觉感觉门控可能不受颞叶rTMS的调节。