Light Jacob G, Fransen James W, Adekunle Adewumi N, Adkins Alice, Pangeni Gobinda, Loudin James, Mathieson Keith, Palanker Daniel V, McCall Maureen A, Pardue Machelle T
Ophthalmology, Emory University, USA; Rehab R&D Center of Excellence, Atlanta VA Medical Center, USA.
Anatomical Sciences & Neurobiology, University of Louisville, USA.
Exp Eye Res. 2014 Nov;128:34-42. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
Photovoltaic arrays (PVA) implanted into the subretinal space of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) are designed to electrically stimulate the remaining inner retinal circuitry in response to incident light, thereby recreating a visual signal when photoreceptor function declines or is lost. Preservation of inner retinal circuitry is critical to the fidelity of this transmitted signal to ganglion cells and beyond to higher visual targets. Post-implantation loss of retinal interneurons or excessive glial scarring could diminish and/or eliminate PVA-evoked signal transmission. As such, assessing the morphology of the inner retina in RP animal models with subretinal PVAs is an important step in defining biocompatibility and predicting success of signal transmission. In this study, we used immunohistochemical methods to qualitatively and quantitatively compare inner retinal morphology after the implantation of a PVA in two RP models: the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS) or transgenic S334ter-line 3 (S334ter-3) rhodopsin mutant rat. Two PVA designs were compared. In the RCS rat, we implanted devices in the subretinal space at 4 weeks of age and histologically examined them at 8 weeks of age and found inner retinal morphology preservation with both PVA devices. In the S334ter-3 rat, we implanted devices at 6-12 weeks of age and again, inner retinal morphology was generally preserved with either PVA design 16-26 weeks post-implantation. Specifically, the length of rod bipolar cells and numbers of cholinergic amacrine cells were maintained along with their characteristic inner plexiform lamination patterns. Throughout the implanted retinas we found nonspecific glial reaction, but none showed additional glial scarring at the implant site. Our results indicate that subretinally implanted PVAs are well-tolerated in rodent RP models and that the inner retinal circuitry is preserved, consistent with our published results showing implant-evoked signal transmission.
植入视网膜色素变性(RP)患者视网膜下间隙的光伏阵列(PVA)旨在响应入射光,对剩余的视网膜内层电路进行电刺激,从而在光感受器功能下降或丧失时重新产生视觉信号。视网膜内层电路的保留对于该传输信号至神经节细胞及更高视觉目标的保真度至关重要。植入后视网膜中间神经元的丢失或过度的胶质瘢痕形成可能会减少和/或消除PVA诱发的信号传输。因此,评估视网膜下植入PVA的RP动物模型中视网膜内层的形态,是定义生物相容性和预测信号传输成功与否的重要步骤。在本研究中,我们使用免疫组织化学方法,对两种RP模型(皇家外科学院(RCS)或转基因S334ter-3系3(S334ter-3)视紫红质突变大鼠)植入PVA后的视网膜内层形态进行定性和定量比较。比较了两种PVA设计。在RCS大鼠中,我们在4周龄时将装置植入视网膜下间隙,并在8周龄时进行组织学检查,发现两种PVA装置均能保留视网膜内层形态。在S334ter-3大鼠中,我们在6至12周龄时植入装置,同样,在植入后16至26周,两种PVA设计通常都能保留视网膜内层形态。具体而言,视杆双极细胞的长度和胆碱能无长突细胞的数量及其特征性的内网层分层模式得以维持。在整个植入的视网膜中,我们发现了非特异性的胶质反应,但在植入部位均未发现额外的胶质瘢痕形成。我们的结果表明,视网膜下植入的PVA在啮齿类RP模型中耐受性良好,视网膜内层电路得以保留,这与我们发表的显示植入诱发信号传输的结果一致。