Suppr超能文献

在经皮创伤性脊柱手术的椎体后凸成形术中,我们应该担心骨水泥渗漏吗?连续76例的单一经验。

Should we fear cement leakage during kyphoplasty in percutaneous traumatic spine surgery? A single experience with 76 consecutive cases.

作者信息

Capel C, Fichten A, Nicot B, Lefranc M, Toussaint P, Desenclos C, Deramond H, Le Gars D, Peltier J

机构信息

Service de neurochirurgie, CHU d'Amiens, place Victor-Pauchet, 80054 Amiens cedex 1, France.

Service de neurochirurgie, CHU d'Amiens, place Victor-Pauchet, 80054 Amiens cedex 1, France.

出版信息

Neurochirurgie. 2014 Dec;60(6):293-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although kyphoplasty is widely used to repair osteoporotic and pathologic vertebral fractures, balloon kyphoplasty and vertebral body stenting are new treatment options in cases of traumatic spinal injury. To our knowledge, there are no literature data on the incidence of cement leakage whereas these two percutaneous techniques are commonly used to repair non-pathologic fractures. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the clinical characteristics and the incidence of cement leakage associated with balloon kyphoplasty and vertebral body stenting in the percutaneous treatment of traumatic spinal injury.

METHODS

A series of 76 consecutive kyphoplasties (50 with vertebral body stenting and 26 balloon kyphoplasties) were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were analyzed in order to detect cement leakage and grade it as minor, moderate or major.

RESULTS

The overall leakage rate was 50%. None of the leakages gave rise to clinical symptoms. Although balloon kyphoplasty and vertebral body stenting did not differ in terms of the leakage rate, the latter technique was associated with a lower leakage volume. The Magerl type, fracture level and use of concomitant osteosynthesis did not appear to significantly influence the leakage rate.

CONCLUSION

Vertebral body stenting can reduce the amount of cement leakage due to a better cohesion of the bone fragments after kyphosis correction and maintenance.

摘要

目的

尽管椎体后凸成形术广泛用于修复骨质疏松性和病理性椎体骨折,但球囊椎体后凸成形术和椎体支架置入术是创伤性脊柱损伤病例的新治疗选择。据我们所知,在这两种经皮技术常用于修复非病理性骨折的情况下,尚无关于骨水泥渗漏发生率的文献数据。本研究的目的是评估和比较球囊椎体后凸成形术和椎体支架置入术在经皮治疗创伤性脊柱损伤时的临床特征及骨水泥渗漏发生率。

方法

回顾性分析连续进行的76例椎体后凸成形术(50例椎体支架置入术和26例球囊椎体后凸成形术)。分析术前和术后的计算机断层扫描以检测骨水泥渗漏并将其分为轻度、中度或重度。

结果

总体渗漏率为50%。所有渗漏均未引起临床症状。尽管球囊椎体后凸成形术和椎体支架置入术在渗漏率方面无差异,但后者技术的渗漏量较低。马格勒(Magerl)类型、骨折节段以及是否同时使用骨合成材料似乎对渗漏率无显著影响。

结论

椎体支架置入术可因在矫正后凸畸形并维持其稳定性后骨碎片更好地愈合而减少骨水泥渗漏量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验