• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

越大就越好吗?一项关于髋部骨折治疗单元规模、30天死亡率、住院护理质量及住院时长的全国性研究。

Is bigger always better? A nationwide study of hip fracture unit volume, 30-day mortality, quality of in-hospital care, and length of hospital stay.

作者信息

Kristensen Pia K, Thillemann Theis M, Johnsen Søren P

机构信息

*Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital Horsens, Sundvej, Horsens †Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Med Care. 2014 Dec;52(12):1023-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000234.

DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000000234
PMID:25226544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Higher patient volume has been linked with better clinical outcomes for a range of surgical procedures; however, little is known about the impact of volume on quality of care and clinical outcome among patients with hip fracture.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between hip fracture patient volume and 30-day mortality, quality of in-hospital care, time to surgery, and length of hospital stay, respectively.

DESIGN

Population-based follow-up study.

SUBJECTS

Using prospectively collected data from the Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry, we identified 12,065 patients 65 years and older who were admitted with a hip fracture between March 1, 2010 and November 30, 2011.

MEASURES

Patient volume was divided into 3 groups; ≤ 151 hip fracture admissions per year, 152-350, and ≥ 351 admissions per year based on the distribution of the hospitals and to ensure a reasonable proportion of hospitals in each category. Data were analyzed using regression techniques while controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Admission to high-volume units was associated with higher 30-day mortality [adjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.37 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-1.64)] and a longer length of hospital stay (adjusted relative time=1.25 (95% CI, 1.02-1.52)]. Furthermore, patients had lower odds for being mobilized within 24 hours postoperatively and for receiving basic mobility assessment and a postdischarge rehabilitation program. Time to surgery was nonsignificantly increased [adjusted relative time=1.25 (95% CI, 0.99-1.58)].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients admitted to high-volume hip fracture units had higher mortality rates, received a lower quality of in-hospital care, and had longer length of hospital stay.

摘要

背景

对于一系列外科手术而言,较高的患者数量与更好的临床结局相关;然而,关于手术量对髋部骨折患者护理质量和临床结局的影响却知之甚少。

目的

分别研究髋部骨折患者数量与30天死亡率、住院护理质量、手术时间以及住院时长之间的关联。

设计

基于人群的随访研究。

研究对象

利用丹麦多学科髋部骨折登记处前瞻性收集的数据,我们确定了2010年3月1日至2011年11月30日期间因髋部骨折入院的12065名65岁及以上的患者。

测量指标

根据医院分布将患者数量分为3组;每年髋部骨折入院人数≤151例、152 - 350例以及≥351例,以确保每组中有合理比例的医院。在控制潜在混杂因素的同时,使用回归技术对数据进行分析。

结果

入住高手术量科室与较高的30天死亡率[调整优势比(OR)=1.37(95%置信区间(CI),1.14 - 1.64)]以及较长的住院时长(调整相对时间=1.25(95%CI,1.02 - 1.52))相关。此外,患者术后24小时内活动的几率较低,接受基本活动能力评估和出院后康复计划的几率也较低。手术时间虽有增加,但无显著差异[调整相对时间=1.25(95%CI,0.99 - 1.58)]。

结论

入住高手术量髋部骨折科室的患者死亡率较高,住院护理质量较低,住院时长较长。

相似文献

1
Is bigger always better? A nationwide study of hip fracture unit volume, 30-day mortality, quality of in-hospital care, and length of hospital stay.越大就越好吗?一项关于髋部骨折治疗单元规模、30天死亡率、住院护理质量及住院时长的全国性研究。
Med Care. 2014 Dec;52(12):1023-9. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000234.
2
Can improved quality of care explain the success of orthogeriatric units? A population-based cohort study.护理质量的提高能否解释老年骨科单元的成功?一项基于人群的队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2016 Jan;45(1):66-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv155. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
3
Off-hours admission and quality of hip fracture care: a nationwide cohort study of performance measures and 30-day mortality.非工作时间入院与髋部骨折护理质量:一项关于绩效指标和30天死亡率的全国性队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2016 Jun;28(3):324-31. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzw037. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
4
Socioeconomic inequality in clinical outcome among hip fracture patients: a nationwide cohort study.髋部骨折患者临床结局的社会经济不平等:一项全国性队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Apr;28(4):1233-1243. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3853-7. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
5
Measures of clinical outcome before, during, and after implementation of a comprehensive geriatric hip fracture program: is there a learning curve?在全面老年髋部骨折计划实施前后的临床结果测量:是否存在学习曲线?
J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Dec;27(12):672-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318291f0e5.
6
Hip fracture outcomes: does surgeon or hospital volume really matter?髋部骨折的治疗结果:外科医生或医院的手术量真的重要吗?
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):809-14. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816166bb.
7
Re-admission to Level 2 unit after hip-fracture surgery - Risk factors, reasons and outcome.髋部骨折手术后再次入住二级护理病房——风险因素、原因及结果。
Injury. 2013 Dec;44(12):1919-25. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
8
Hospital mortality after hip fracture surgery in relation to length of stay by care delivery factors: A database study.髋部骨折手术后医院死亡率与护理提供因素相关住院时间的关系:一项数据库研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr;96(16):e6683. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006683.
9
Is the higher mortality among men with hip fracture explained by sex-related differences in quality of in-hospital care? A population-based cohort study.髋部骨折男性较高的死亡率是否可由住院治疗质量的性别差异来解释?一项基于人群的队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):193-199. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw225.
10
Outcome following proximal femoral fracture in Northern Ireland.北爱尔兰股骨近端骨折后的结局
Ulster Med J. 2006 Sep;75(3):200-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and Hospital Factors Affecting the Timing of Hip Fracture Surgery: A Risk-Stratified Analysis in the United States.影响髋部骨折手术时机的患者和医院因素:美国的风险分层分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2025 Apr 23. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002998.
2
Which performance indicators are used globally for evaluating healthcare in patients with a hip fracture? : a mixed methods systematic review.全球用于评估髋部骨折患者医疗保健的绩效指标有哪些?:一项混合方法的系统评价。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Mar 6;6(3):275-290. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.63.BJO-2024-0104.R1.
3
The Impact of Hospital Volume and Region on Mortality, Medical Costs, and Length of Hospital Stay in Elderly Patients Following Hip Fracture: A Nationwide Claims Database Analysis.
医院规模和地区对老年髋部骨折患者死亡率、医疗费用及住院时间的影响:一项全国索赔数据库分析
Clin Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(1):80-90. doi: 10.4055/cios24193. Epub 2024 Dec 9.
4
What factors affect early mobilisation following hip fracture surgery: a scoping review.影响髋部骨折手术后早期活动的因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jan 21;12(Suppl 2):e002281. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002281.
5
Time to surgery after proximal femur fracture in geriatric patients depends on hospital size and provided level of care: analysis of the Registry for Geriatric Trauma (ATR-DGU).老年股骨近端骨折患者的手术时间取决于医院规模和提供的护理水平:老年创伤登记处(ATR-DGU)分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Aug;49(4):1827-1833. doi: 10.1007/s00068-023-02246-4. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
6
The case for decreased surgeon-reported complications due to surgical volume and fellowship status in the treatment of geriatric hip fracture: An analysis of the ABOS database.由于手术量和 fellowship 身份,外科医生报告的老年髋部骨折治疗并发症减少的情况:对 ABOS 数据库的分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0263475. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263475. eCollection 2022.
7
Variations in hip fracture inpatient care in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan: an analysis of health administrative data.日本、韩国和中国台湾地区髋部骨折住院治疗的差异:基于卫生行政数据的分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 13;21(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06621-y.
8
High volumes of recent surgical admissions, time to surgery, and 60-day mortality.近期大量的外科手术入院病例、手术时间及60天死亡率。
Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):264-270. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-1581.R1.
9
Clinical management of hip fractures in elderly patients with dementia and postoperative 30-day mortality: A population-based cohort study.老年痴呆症患者髋部骨折的临床管理和术后 30 天死亡率:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Brain Behav. 2020 Nov;10(11):e01823. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1823. Epub 2020 Sep 6.
10
The Danish Multidisciplinary Hip Fracture Registry 13-Year Results from a Population-Based Cohort of Hip Fracture Patients.丹麦多学科髋部骨折登记处:基于人群的髋部骨折患者队列13年的研究结果。
Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jan 9;12:9-21. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S231578. eCollection 2020.