Narayanan Kumar, Reinier Kyndaron, Teodorescu Carmen, Uy-Evanado Audrey, Aleong Ryan, Chugh Harpriya, Nichols Gregory A, Gunson Karen, London Barry, Jui Jonathan, Chugh Sumeet S
Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA (K.N., K.R., C.T., A.U.E., H.C., S.S.C.).
University of Colorado, Denver, CO (R.A.).
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Sep 16;3(5):e001193. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001193.
Left ventricular (LV) diameter is routinely measured on the echocardiogram but has not been jointly evaluated with the ejection fraction (EF) for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death (SCD).
From a large ongoing community-based study of SCD (The Oregon Sudden Unexpected Death Study; population ≈1 million), SCD cases were compared with geographic controls. LVEF and LV diameter, measured using the LV internal dimension in diastole (categorized as normal, mild, moderate, or severe dilatation using American Society of Echocardiography definitions) were assessed from echocardiograms prior but unrelated to the SCD event. Cases (n=418; 69.5±13.8 years), compared with controls (n=329; 67.7±11.9 years), more commonly had severe LV dysfunction (EF ≤35%; 30.5% versus 18.8%; P<0.01) and larger LV diameter (52.2±10.5 mm versus 49.7±7.9 mm; P<0.01). Moderate or severe LV dilatation (16.3% versus 8.2%; P=0.001) and severe LV dilatation (8.1% versus 2.1%; P<0.001) were significantly more frequent in cases. In multivariable analysis, severe LV dilatation was an independent predictor of SCD (odds ratio 2.5 [95% CI 1.03 to 5.9]; P=0.04). In addition, subjects with both EF ≤35% and severe LV dilatation had higher odds for SCD compared with those with low EF only (odds ratio 3.8 [95% CI 1.5 to 10.2] for both versus 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.5] for low EF only), suggesting that severe LV dilatation additively increased SCD risk.
LV diameter may contribute to risk stratification for SCD independent of the LVEF. This readily available echocardiographic measure warrants further prospective evaluation.
左心室(LV)直径通常在超声心动图上测量,但尚未与射血分数(EF)联合用于心脏性猝死(SCD)的风险分层评估。
在一项正在进行的基于社区的大型SCD研究(俄勒冈州意外猝死研究;人口约100万)中,将SCD病例与地理匹配的对照进行比较。使用舒张末期左心室内径测量左心室射血分数(LVEF)和左心室直径(根据美国超声心动图学会的定义分为正常、轻度、中度或重度扩张),这些测量来自于与SCD事件之前无关的超声心动图。病例组(n = 418;69.5±13.8岁)与对照组(n = 329;67.7±11.9岁)相比,更常见严重左心室功能障碍(EF≤35%;30.5%对18.8%;P<0.01)和更大的左心室直径(52.2±10.5mm对49.7±7.9mm;P<0.01)。病例组中度或重度左心室扩张(16.3%对8.2%;P = 0.001)和重度左心室扩张(8.1%对2.1%;P<0.001)明显更常见。在多变量分析中,重度左心室扩张是SCD的独立预测因素(比值比2.5 [95%CI 1.03至5.9];P = 0.04)。此外,与仅EF降低的受试者相比,EF≤35%且左心室严重扩张的受试者发生SCD的几率更高(两者均有的比值比3.8 [95%CI 1.5至10.2],仅EF降低的为1.7 [95%CI 1.2至2.5]),提示重度左心室扩张会增加SCD风险。
左心室直径可能独立于左心室射血分数对SCD进行风险分层。这种易于获得的超声心动图测量方法值得进一步前瞻性评估。