Han Youngjin, Park Hojong, Kwon Sun U, Kang Dong-Wha, Lee Deok Hee, Kwon Hyunwook, Kwon Tae-Won, Cho Yong-Pil, Kim Geun-Eun
From the Departments of Surgery (Y.H., H.K., T.-W.K., Y.-P.C., G.-E.K.), Neurology (S.U.K., D.-W.K.), and Radiology (D.H.L.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine and Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea; and Department of Surgery (H.P.), Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, South Korea.
Stroke. 2014 Nov;45(11):3443-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007181. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
When carotid artery tandem lesions are present, the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to reduce recurrent stroke remain uncertain. The present retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of CEA for carotid artery tandem stenosis that was diagnosed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Six hundred forty-seven consecutive patients underwent CEA between January 2001 and December 2010. Tandem stenosis, defined as a significant carotid bifurcation stenosis and identifiable stenosis of ≥50% of any downstream distal cerebral artery, was identified in 92 patients (14.2%) by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Patients with and without tandem stenosis were compared in terms of CEA outcomes. The primary end point was the composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the periprocedural period or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years after CEA.
Tandem stenosis did not associate with ipsilateral stroke during postoperative follow-up. The 2 groups did not differ in terms of estimated 4-year primary end point rates (8.7% versus 3.8%; P=0.07) or ipsilateral stroke-free (P=0.56), any stroke-free (P=0.89), or overall survival (P=0.41) rates.
After diagnosis by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, patients with and without tandem stenosis had similar rates of stroke and death.
当存在颈动脉串联病变时,颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)降低复发性卒中的益处仍不明确。本回顾性队列研究旨在确定经对比增强磁共振血管造影诊断的颈动脉串联狭窄患者接受CEA后的临床结局。
2001年1月至2010年12月期间,647例连续患者接受了CEA。通过对比增强磁共振血管造影在92例患者(14.2%)中发现串联狭窄,定义为显著的颈动脉分叉狭窄以及任何下游远端脑动脉≥50%的可识别狭窄。比较有和没有串联狭窄的患者的CEA结局。主要终点是围手术期任何卒中、心肌梗死或死亡,或CEA后4年内同侧卒中的复合情况。
术后随访期间,串联狭窄与同侧卒中无关。两组在估计的4年主要终点发生率(8.7%对3.8%;P=0.07)、同侧无卒中(P=0.56)、任何无卒中(P=0.89)或总生存率(P=0.41)方面无差异。
经对比增强磁共振血管造影诊断后,有和没有串联狭窄的患者卒中率和死亡率相似。