Ballotta Enzo, Toniato Antonio, Da Roit Anna, Baracchini Claudio
The Vascular Surgery Group, 2nd Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Via N. Giustiniani, 2, 35128, Padua, Italy.
Department of Neurosciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padua, Italy.
World J Surg. 2015 Nov;39(11):2823-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3165-7.
The risk of perioperative stroke and the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remain uncertain in the case of an ipsilateral intracranial stenosis. The aim of this observational study was to analyze the early and late outcomes of CEA in patients with a carotid tandem lesion (CTL), defined as a severe stenosis at the bifurcation with any concomitant lesion ≥50 % involving the intracranial portion of the ipsilateral internal carotid artery or the main trunk of the anterior or middle cerebral artery.
From 2000 to 2009, 1143 patients underwent CEA for symptomatic or asymptomatic extracranial carotid stenosis according to the NASCET and ACAS recommendations, respectively. CTLs were diagnosed in 219 patients (19.2 %) by extracranial and transcranial color-coded Doppler sonography combined with noninvasive brain imaging studies. The primary endpoints of the study were perioperative (30-day) stroke and death, and any ipsilateral ischemic adverse events during the follow-up, which ranged from 0.1 to 10 years (mean 4.9 ± 3.3 years). The rates of the primary endpoints were compared between patients with (group I) and without CTL (group II).
Overall, 219 CEAs were performed in group I and 924 in group II. Nearly two in three of the carotid lesions (777 of 1143, 68 %) were symptomatic at presentation (62.1 % in group I vs 69.4 % in group II; p = 0.03), with a 23.8 % rate of stroke (21.9 % in group I vs 24.2 % in group II; p = 0.85). There were 2 (0.9 %) perioperative ipsilateral strokes in group I and 5 (0.5 %) in group II (p = 0.62), and no deaths. The 5-year ipsilateral stroke-free, any stroke-free, and overall survival rates did not differ significantly between patients with and without CTL.
This study has shown that patients with and without CTL who underwent CEA had a similar occurrence of perioperative adverse events (probably due to the extremely low incidence of perioperative complications) and comparable late outcomes, suggesting that the presence of CTL does not justify refusing CEA for patients who could benefit from it.
对于同侧颅内狭窄患者,围手术期卒中风险及颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)的益处仍不明确。本观察性研究的目的是分析颈动脉串联病变(CTL)患者行CEA的早期和晚期结局,CTL定义为颈动脉分叉处严重狭窄且同侧颈内动脉颅内段或大脑前动脉或大脑中动脉主干存在任何≥50%的伴随病变。
2000年至2009年,1143例患者分别根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)和无症状颈动脉粥样硬化研究(ACAS)的建议,因有症状或无症状的颅外颈动脉狭窄接受了CEA。通过颅外和经颅彩色编码多普勒超声联合无创脑成像研究,在219例患者(19.2%)中诊断出CTL。本研究的主要终点是围手术期(30天)卒中及死亡,以及随访期间(0.1至10年,平均4.9±3.3年)任何同侧缺血性不良事件。比较有CTL患者(I组)和无CTL患者(II组)的主要终点发生率。
总体而言,I组进行了219例CEA,II组进行了924例。近三分之二的颈动脉病变(1143例中的777例,68%)在就诊时具有症状(I组为62.1%,II组为69.4%;p = 0.03),卒中发生率为23.8%(I组为21.9%,II组为24.2%;p = 0.85)。I组有2例(0.9%)围手术期同侧卒中,II组有5例(0.5%)(p = 0.62),无死亡病例。有CTL和无CTL的患者5年同侧无卒中、无任何卒中及总体生存率无显著差异。
本研究表明,接受CEA的有CTL和无CTL患者围手术期不良事件发生率相似(可能由于围手术期并发症发生率极低)且晚期结局相当,这表明对于可能从CEA中获益的患者,CTL的存在并不足以成为拒绝CEA的理由。