Cannada Lisa K
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Oct;28 Suppl 10:S23-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000210.
Fellowship training has become an expected extension of residency. The OTA has led the way in orthopaedics with a carefully orchestrated process, which has evolved to meet the needs of the growing interest in postgraduate orthopaedic trauma fellowships. The OTA developed the Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Advancement in a time when industry support of fellowships was declining. With the growth in fellowship programs to meet the growth of fellowship applicants, quality control has become an issue. Given that every fellowship experience is unique and the lack of regulatory control for non-Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education programs, the OTA has initiated its own accreditation process. The purpose of this article is to discuss current trends in orthopaedic trauma fellowship education regarding how many fellows should be trained, how to adequately pay for this training, and how the current dilemmas in fellowship training could be avoided. These issues are vital to understand in the context of health policy issues surrounding orthopaedic trauma.
专科培训已成为住院医师培训预期的延伸。骨创伤协会(OTA)在骨科领域率先精心策划了一个流程,该流程不断发展以满足对研究生骨科创伤专科培训日益增长的兴趣需求。在行业对专科培训的支持逐渐减少之际,OTA成立了骨科创伤发展中心。随着专科培训项目的增加以满足专科培训申请者的增长,质量控制已成为一个问题。鉴于每个专科培训经历都是独特的,且对于非研究生医学教育认证委员会的项目缺乏监管控制,OTA已启动了自己的认证流程。本文的目的是讨论骨科创伤专科培训教育的当前趋势,包括应培训多少名专科生、如何为这种培训提供充足资金,以及如何避免当前专科培训中的困境。在围绕骨科创伤的卫生政策问题背景下理解这些问题至关重要。