Weissert W G, Cready C M
Program on Aging, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599.
Inquiry. 1989 Spring;26(1):116-29.
Home- and community-based long-term care services offered in more than two dozen controlled experiments conducted in the past 30 years are subjected to a "break-even" analysis. We found that health care costs for the treatment group averaged only about 14% more than the control group across all studies and a similar amount among the subset of studies evaluated since 1980. Because patient benefits were so minimal, they would have to be valued at an exceedingly high rate to break even from a social cost perspective. On the other hand, improved operating efficiency might make cost-accounting break-even an almost achievable goal. Improvements needed include better targeting of high-risk patients and better utilization controls on home and community care services. A prospective budgeting model with performance goals may be helpful.
在过去30年进行的二十多项对照实验中提供的基于家庭和社区的长期护理服务,都要进行“收支平衡”分析。我们发现,在所有研究中,治疗组的医疗保健成本平均仅比对照组高出约14%,在1980年以来评估的研究子集中也是类似水平。由于患者受益非常有限,从社会成本角度来看,要实现收支平衡,就必须对其进行极高的估值。另一方面,提高运营效率可能会使成本核算实现收支平衡成为一个几乎可以实现的目标。需要改进的方面包括更好地针对高风险患者以及更好地控制家庭和社区护理服务的使用。一个具有绩效目标的前瞻性预算模型可能会有所帮助。