Eggert G M, Zimmer J G, Hall W J, Friedman B
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Rochester, School of Medicine and Dentistry, NY.
Health Serv Res. 1991 Oct;26(4):471-507.
This randomized controlled study compared two types of case management for skilled nursing level patients living at home: the centralized individual model and the neighborhood team model. The team model differed from the individual model in that team case managers performed client assessments, care planning, some direct services, and reassessments; they also had much smaller caseloads and were assigned a specific catchment area. While patients in both groups incurred very high estimated health services costs, the average annual cost during 1983-85 for team cases was 13.6 percent less than that of individual model cases. While the team cases were 18.3 percent less expensive among "old" patients (patients who entered the study from the existing ACCESS caseload), they were only 2.7 percent less costly among "new" cases. The lower costs were due to reductions in hospital days and home care. Team cases averaged 26 percent fewer hospital days per year and 17 percent fewer home health aide hours. Nursing home use was 48 percent higher for the team group than for the individual model group. Mortality was almost exactly the same for both groups during the first year (about 30 percent), but was lower for team patients during the second year (11 percent as compared to 16 percent). Probable mechanisms for the observed results are discussed.
集中式个体模式和社区团队模式。团队模式与个体模式的不同之处在于,团队病例管理者负责客户评估、护理计划、一些直接服务以及重新评估;他们的工作量也少得多,并被分配了特定的服务区域。虽然两组患者的预计医疗服务成本都非常高,但1983 - 1985年期间团队病例的年均成本比个体模式病例低13.6%。在“老”患者(即从现有ACCESS病例库进入研究的患者)中,团队病例的成本低18.3%,而在“新”病例中,成本仅低2.7%。成本降低归因于住院天数和家庭护理的减少。团队病例每年的平均住院天数少26%,家庭健康护理助手的工作时长少17%。团队组的养老院使用率比个体模式组高48%。两组在第一年的死亡率几乎完全相同(约30%),但在第二年,团队患者的死亡率较低(11%,而个体模式组为16%)。文中讨论了观察结果可能的机制。