Guo Li-Li, Li Li, Liu Yao-Wei, Herr Keela
Department of Nursing, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):212-21. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12677. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale and the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators in Chinese older adults post surgery during the anaesthesia recovery period.
Pain assessment in older surgical patients is complicated by factors such as anaesthesia and opioid administration. Although observational pain behavioural assessment tools have been validated for those unable to self-report, research on their application during the anaesthesia recovery period is limited.
A prospective correlational design.
Ninety-three older patients admitted for scheduled abdominal surgery were recruited in a university-affiliated hospital. The two observational scales were used to conduct pain assessments during the anaesthesia recovery period. On the first and the third postoperative day, participants recalled their pain intensity during the recovery period using the Numeric Rating Scale or the Faces Pain Scale-Revised.
The internal consistency reliability of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale and the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators was 0·81 and 0·69 respectively. The correlation between scores of the two observational scales was 0·95. The recalled self-reports of pain intensity were significantly correlated. The correlation of the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale and patients' recalled self-reports was 0·55, 0·54, and the correlation between the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators and the two recalled pain scores was both 0·60.
Both the two observational scales had good reliability and validity when used to assess pain in Chinese surgical older adults during the anaesthesia recovery period.
Observational pain scales can be useful as a tool for patients unable to self-report. Accurate use of one of the observational pain tools can help identify pain during the anaesthesia recovery period, when patients are unable to self-report, to support effective pain management during this period.
评估晚期痴呆疼痛评估量表及非言语疼痛指标检查表在中国老年患者术后麻醉恢复期的信度和效度。
老年外科患者的疼痛评估因麻醉和阿片类药物使用等因素而变得复杂。尽管观察性疼痛行为评估工具已在无法自我报告的患者中得到验证,但关于其在麻醉恢复期应用的研究有限。
前瞻性相关性设计。
选取一所大学附属医院93例择期腹部手术的老年患者。在麻醉恢复期使用这两种观察性量表进行疼痛评估。在术后第1天和第3天,参与者使用数字评分量表或面部疼痛量表修订版回忆其恢复期的疼痛强度。
晚期痴呆疼痛评估量表及非言语疼痛指标检查表的内部一致性信度分别为0.81和0.69。两种观察性量表得分的相关性为0.95。回忆的自我报告疼痛强度显著相关。晚期痴呆疼痛评估量表与患者回忆的自我报告的相关性分别为0.55、0.54,非言语疼痛指标检查表与两个回忆疼痛评分的相关性均为0.60。
在评估中国老年外科患者麻醉恢复期疼痛时,这两种观察性量表均具有良好的信度和效度。
观察性疼痛量表可作为无法自我报告患者的有用工具。准确使用其中一种观察性疼痛工具有助于在患者无法自我报告的麻醉恢复期识别疼痛,以支持该时期的有效疼痛管理。