García-Arieta Alfredo
Head of Service on Pharmacokinetics and Generics, Division of Pharmacology and Clinical Evaluation, Department of Human Use Medicines, Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Care Products, Madrid, Spain.
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014 Dec 18;65:89-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
The aim of the present paper is to illustrate the impact that excipients may have on the bioavailability of drugs and to review existing US-FDA, WHO and EMA regulatory guidelines on this topic. The first examples illustrate that small amounts of sorbitol (7, 50 or 60mg) affect the bioavailability of risperidone, a class I drug, oral solution, in contrast to what is stated in the US-FDA guidance. Another example suggests, in contrast to what is stated in the US-FDA BCS biowaivers guideline, that a small amount of sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) (3.64mg) affects the bioavailability of risperidone tablets, although the reference product also includes SLS in an amount within the normal range for that type of dosage form. These factors are considered sufficient to ensure that excipients do not affect bioavailability according to the WHO guideline. The alternative criterion, defined in the WHO guideline and used in the FIP BCS biowaivers monographs, that asserts that excipients present in generic products of the ICH countries do not affect bioavailability if used in normal amounts, is shown to be incorrect with an example of alendronate (a class III drug) tablets, where 4mg of SLS increases bioavailability more than 5-fold, although a generic product in the USA contains SLS. Finally, another example illustrates that a 2mg difference in SLS may affect bioavailability of a generic product of a class II drug, even if SLS is contained in the comparator product, and in all cases its amount was within the normal range. Therefore, waivers of in vivo bioequivalence studies (e.g., BCS biowaivers, waivers of certain dosage forms in solution at the time of administration and variations in the excipient composition) should be assessed more cautiously.
本文旨在阐述辅料可能对药物生物利用度产生的影响,并综述美国食品药品监督管理局(US-FDA)、世界卫生组织(WHO)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)关于该主题的现有监管指南。第一个例子表明,与US-FDA指南所述内容相反,少量山梨醇(7mg、50mg或60mg)会影响I类药物利培酮口服溶液的生物利用度。另一个例子表明,与US-FDA生物药剂学分类系统(BCS)生物豁免指南所述内容相反,少量十二烷基硫酸钠(SLS)(3.64mg)会影响利培酮片剂的生物利用度,尽管参比制剂在该剂型的正常范围内也含有SLS。根据WHO指南,这些因素被认为足以确保辅料不会影响生物利用度。WHO指南中定义并在国际药学联合会(FIP)BCS生物豁免专论中使用的替代标准断言,如果ICH国家仿制药中使用的辅料用量正常,则不会影响生物利用度,但阿仑膦酸钠(III类药物)片剂的例子表明该标准是错误的,在这个例子中,4mg的SLS使生物利用度提高了5倍多,尽管美国的一种仿制药中含有SLS。最后,另一个例子表明,即使参比制剂中含有SLS,且其用量在所有情况下都在正常范围内,SLS中2mg的差异也可能影响II类药物仿制药的生物利用度。因此,对体内生物等效性研究的豁免(例如,BCS生物豁免、给药时某些溶液剂型的豁免以及辅料组成的变化)应进行更谨慎的评估。