• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

IMS核心糖尿病模型的验证

Validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model.

作者信息

McEwan Phil, Foos Volker, Palmer James L, Lamotte Mark, Lloyd Adam, Grant David

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Wales, UK; Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd., Monmouth, UK.

Health Economics and Outcomes Research, IMS Health, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.007
PMID:25236995
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The IMS CORE Diabetes Model (CDM) is a widely published and validated simulation model applied in both type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) analyses. Validation to external studies is an important part of demonstrating model credibility.

OBJECTIVE

Because the CDM is widely used to estimate long-term clinical outcomes in diabetes patients, the objective of this analysis was to validate the CDM to contemporary outcomes studies, including those with long-term follow-up periods.

METHODS

A total of 112 validation simulations were performed, stratified by study follow-up duration. For long-term results (≥15-year follow-up), simulation cohorts representing baseline Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) cohorts were generated and intensive and conventional treatment arms were defined in the CDM. Predicted versus observed macrovascular and microvascular complications and all-cause mortality were assessed using the coefficient of determination (R(2)) goodness-of-fit measure.

RESULTS

Across all validation studies, the CDM simulations produced an R(2) statistic of 0.90. For validation studies with a follow-up duration of less than 15 years, R(2) values of 0.90 and 0.88 were achieved for T1DM and T2DM respectively. In T1DM, validating against 30-year outcomes data (DCCT) resulted in an R(2) of 0.72. In T2DM, validating against 20-year outcomes data (UKPDS) resulted in an R(2) of 0.92.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis supports the CDM as a credible tool for predicting the absolute number of clinical events in DCCT- and UKPDS-like populations. With increasing incidence of diabetes worldwide, the CDM is particularly important for health care decision makers, for whom the robust evaluation of health care policies is essential.

摘要

背景

IMS核心糖尿病模型(CDM)是一个广泛发表且经过验证的模拟模型,应用于1型糖尿病(T1DM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)分析。与外部研究进行验证是证明模型可信度的重要部分。

目的

由于CDM被广泛用于估计糖尿病患者的长期临床结局,本分析的目的是将CDM与当代结局研究进行验证,包括那些具有长期随访期的研究。

方法

共进行了112次验证模拟,按研究随访持续时间分层。对于长期结果(≥15年随访),生成了代表基线糖尿病控制与并发症试验(DCCT)和英国前瞻性糖尿病研究(UKPDS)队列的模拟队列,并在CDM中定义了强化治疗组和常规治疗组。使用决定系数(R²)拟合优度测量评估预测的与观察到的大血管和微血管并发症以及全因死亡率。

结果

在所有验证研究中,CDM模拟产生的R²统计值为0.90。对于随访持续时间少于15年的验证研究,T1DM和T2DM的R²值分别为0.90和0.88。在T1DM中,根据30年结局数据(DCCT)进行验证,R²为0.72。在T2DM中,根据20年结局数据(UKPDS)进行验证,R²为0.92。

结论

本分析支持CDM作为预测DCCT和UKPDS样人群临床事件绝对数量的可靠工具。随着全球糖尿病发病率的增加,CDM对医疗保健决策者尤为重要,对他们来说,对医疗保健政策进行有力评估至关重要。

相似文献

1
Validation of the IMS CORE Diabetes Model.IMS核心糖尿病模型的验证
Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):714-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.007.
2
Validation of economic and health outcomes simulation model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (ECHO-T2DM).2 型糖尿病经济和健康结局模拟模型的验证(ECHO-T2DM)。
J Med Econ. 2013 Aug;16(8):1007-21. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.809352. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
3
Validation of the CORE Diabetes Model against epidemiological and clinical studies.针对流行病学和临床研究对CORE糖尿病模型进行验证。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20 Suppl 1:S27-40. doi: 10.1185/030079904X2006.
4
The CORE Diabetes Model: Projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making.核心糖尿病模型:预测1型和2型糖尿病干预措施的长期临床结局、成本及成本效益,以支持临床和报销决策。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2004 Aug;20 Suppl 1:S5-26. doi: 10.1185/030079904X1980.
5
Use of the UKPDS Outcomes Model to predict all-cause mortality in U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: comparison of predicted versus observed mortality.利用 UKPDS 结局模型预测美国成年 2 型糖尿病患者的全因死亡率:预测死亡率与观察死亡率的比较。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jan;91(1):121-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2010.10.011. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
6
Validation of the UKPDS 82 risk equations within the Cardiff Diabetes Model.验证 UKPDS 82 风险方程在加的夫糖尿病模型中的适用性。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2015 Aug 4;13:12. doi: 10.1186/s12962-015-0038-8. eCollection 2015.
7
Direct medical costs for complications among children and adults with diabetes in the US commercial payer setting.美国商业医保支付环境下糖尿病儿童和成人并发症的直接医疗费用。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Apr;12(2):219-30. doi: 10.1007/s40258-014-0086-9.
8
Development and validation of the CHIME simulation model to assess lifetime health outcomes of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in Chinese populations: A modeling study.开发和验证 CHIME 模拟模型,以评估中国人群中糖尿病前期和 2 型糖尿病的终生健康结局:一项建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2021 Jun 24;18(6):e1003692. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003692. eCollection 2021 Jun.
9
Validation of the Economic and Health Outcomes Model of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (ECHO-T2DM).2型糖尿病经济与健康结果模型(ECHO-T2DM)的验证
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Mar;35(3):375-396. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0471-3.
10
Cost of diabetes: comparison of disease-attributable and matched cohort cost estimation methods.糖尿病的成本:疾病归因和匹配队列成本估算方法的比较。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Aug;26(8):1827-34. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.488544.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-time continuous glucose monitoring vs self-monitoring of blood glucose in distinct multi-ethnic cohorts of patients living with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes in the United States: A cost-utility analysis from a Medicare perspective.美国胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者不同多民族队列中实时连续血糖监测与自我血糖监测的比较:基于医疗保险视角的成本效用分析
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Aug;31(8):752-763. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.8.752.
2
Long-term health economic evaluation of automated insulin delivery system compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps and CGM in a real-world setting in Finnish paediatric and adult individuals with type 1 diabetes.在芬兰1型糖尿病儿童和成人的真实环境中,将自动胰岛素输送系统与持续皮下胰岛素输注泵及连续血糖监测进行比较的长期健康经济评估。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Sep;27(9):4793-4801. doi: 10.1111/dom.16520. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
3
The health economics of insulin therapy: How do we address the rising demands, costs, inequalities and barriers to achieving optimal outcomes.胰岛素治疗的卫生经济学:我们如何应对不断增长的需求、成本、不平等现象以及实现最佳治疗效果的障碍。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Jul;27 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):24-35. doi: 10.1111/dom.16488. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
4
The NIDDK Takes on the Complications of Type 1 Diabetes: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) Study.美国国立糖尿病、消化和肾脏疾病研究所应对1型糖尿病并发症:糖尿病控制与并发症试验/糖尿病干预与并发症流行病学(DCCT/EDIC)研究。
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jul 1;48(7):1089-1100. doi: 10.2337/dc24-2885.
5
Impact of real-time glucose monitoring using FreeStyle Libre 3 on glycaemia in type 2 diabetes managed with basal insulin plus SGLT2 inhibitor and/or GLP-1 agonist: the FreeDM2 randomised controlled trial protocol.使用FreeStyle Libre 3进行实时血糖监测对基础胰岛素联合SGLT2抑制剂和/或GLP-1激动剂治疗的2型糖尿病患者血糖水平的影响:FreeDM2随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 15;15(4):e090154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090154.
6
Hybrid closed-loop systems for managing blood glucose levels in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and economic modelling.用于管理1型糖尿病患者血糖水平的混合闭环系统:系统评价与经济建模
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(80):1-190. doi: 10.3310/JYPL3536.
7
Cost-Utility of Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring versus Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in People with Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes in Spain.西班牙胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者中实时连续血糖监测与自我血糖监测的成本效益分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2024 Nov 5;16:785-797. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S483459. eCollection 2024.
8
Development and validation of a chronic kidney disease progression model using patient-level simulations.利用患者水平模拟开发和验证慢性肾脏病进展模型。
Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(2):2406402. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2406402. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
9
Modeling the Clinical and Economic Burden of Therapeutic Inertia in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Saudi Arabia.建模沙特阿拉伯 2 型糖尿病患者治疗惰性的临床和经济负担。
Adv Ther. 2024 Nov;41(11):4140-4152. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02978-8. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
10
Adverse drug events in cost-effectiveness models of pharmacological interventions for diabetes, diabetic retinopathy, and diabetic macular edema: a scoping review.糖尿病、糖尿病视网膜病变和糖尿病黄斑水肿药物干预成本效益模型中的药物不良事件:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Nov 1;22(11):2194-2266. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00511.