Suppr超能文献

在伦敦市中心积极外展服务中社区治疗令的使用情况。

Use of community treatment orders in an inner-London assertive outreach service.

作者信息

Rawala Muffazal, Gupta Susham

机构信息

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London.

East London NHS Foundation Trust, London.

出版信息

Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):13-8. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.112.042184.

Abstract

Aims and method To compare admission rates and bed occupancy before and after the introduction of community treatment orders (CTOs) in 37 assertive outreach service patients. The effect of CTOs on treatment adherence and illicit drug use were also evaluated. The views of patients and care coordinators were obtained through a focus group. Results When CTOs were introduced, admission rates fell from 3.3 to 0.3 per year and average bed occupancy declined from 133.2 to 10.8 days per year. Treatment adherence improved from 4 (10.8%) to 31 (83.7%) patients, and an objective reduction in substance misuse was observed in 25 (67.5%) patients. Whereas patients expressed ambivalence towards CTOs, their care coordinators generally had a more positive view. Clinical implications The decline in hospital usage following the introduction of CTOs is encouraging and could reflect improved adherence and engagement through intensive case management, leading to a reduction in readmissions. However, further studies need to look at quality of life, cost-effectiveness and the impact on patients.

摘要

目的与方法

比较37名积极外展服务患者在引入社区治疗令(CTO)前后的住院率和床位占用情况。还评估了社区治疗令对治疗依从性和非法药物使用的影响。通过焦点小组获取患者和护理协调员的意见。结果:引入社区治疗令后,年住院率从3.3降至0.3,年平均床位占用天数从133.2降至10.8天。治疗依从性从4名(10.8%)患者提高到31名(83.7%)患者,25名(67.5%)患者的药物滥用情况客观上有所减少。患者对社区治疗令态度矛盾,而他们的护理协调员总体上看法更为积极。临床意义:引入社区治疗令后住院率下降令人鼓舞,这可能反映出通过强化个案管理提高了依从性和参与度,从而减少了再入院情况。然而,进一步的研究需要关注生活质量、成本效益以及对患者的影响。

相似文献

2
Do intensive services obviate the need for CTOs?强化服务能否消除对慢性完全闭塞病变治疗的需求?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jul-Aug;47:74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.038. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
9

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Utilization Outcomes Following Assignment to Outpatient Commitment.门诊承诺分配后的医院利用结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Nov;48(6):942-961. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01112-y. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
The utility of outpatient civil commitment: Investigating the evidence.门诊民事强制收治的效用:证据调查。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 May-Jun;70:101565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101565. Epub 2020 May 23.
8
Switching away from pipotiazine palmitate: a naturalistic study.从棕榈酸哌泊噻嗪转换治疗:一项自然主义研究。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2017 Jan;7(1):25-28. doi: 10.1177/2045125316672575. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

5
End of the road for treatment-as-usual studies?常规治疗研究之路走到尽头了吗?
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):5-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062968.
6
Community treatment orders are not a good thing.社区治疗令不是一件好事。
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;193(2):96-100. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.049072.
7
A qualitative analysis of the use of community treatment orders in Saskatchewan.对萨斯喀彻温省社区治疗令使用情况的定性分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):516-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验