• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在伦敦市中心积极外展服务中社区治疗令的使用情况。

Use of community treatment orders in an inner-London assertive outreach service.

作者信息

Rawala Muffazal, Gupta Susham

机构信息

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London.

East London NHS Foundation Trust, London.

出版信息

Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):13-8. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.112.042184.

DOI:10.1192/pb.bp.112.042184
PMID:25237484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4067843/
Abstract

Aims and method To compare admission rates and bed occupancy before and after the introduction of community treatment orders (CTOs) in 37 assertive outreach service patients. The effect of CTOs on treatment adherence and illicit drug use were also evaluated. The views of patients and care coordinators were obtained through a focus group. Results When CTOs were introduced, admission rates fell from 3.3 to 0.3 per year and average bed occupancy declined from 133.2 to 10.8 days per year. Treatment adherence improved from 4 (10.8%) to 31 (83.7%) patients, and an objective reduction in substance misuse was observed in 25 (67.5%) patients. Whereas patients expressed ambivalence towards CTOs, their care coordinators generally had a more positive view. Clinical implications The decline in hospital usage following the introduction of CTOs is encouraging and could reflect improved adherence and engagement through intensive case management, leading to a reduction in readmissions. However, further studies need to look at quality of life, cost-effectiveness and the impact on patients.

摘要

目的与方法

比较37名积极外展服务患者在引入社区治疗令(CTO)前后的住院率和床位占用情况。还评估了社区治疗令对治疗依从性和非法药物使用的影响。通过焦点小组获取患者和护理协调员的意见。结果:引入社区治疗令后,年住院率从3.3降至0.3,年平均床位占用天数从133.2降至10.8天。治疗依从性从4名(10.8%)患者提高到31名(83.7%)患者,25名(67.5%)患者的药物滥用情况客观上有所减少。患者对社区治疗令态度矛盾,而他们的护理协调员总体上看法更为积极。临床意义:引入社区治疗令后住院率下降令人鼓舞,这可能反映出通过强化个案管理提高了依从性和参与度,从而减少了再入院情况。然而,进一步的研究需要关注生活质量、成本效益以及对患者的影响。

相似文献

1
Use of community treatment orders in an inner-London assertive outreach service.在伦敦市中心积极外展服务中社区治疗令的使用情况。
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):13-8. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.112.042184.
2
Do intensive services obviate the need for CTOs?强化服务能否消除对慢性完全闭塞病变治疗的需求?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2016 Jul-Aug;47:74-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2016.02.038. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
3
Assertive outreach teams in London: patient characteristics and outcomes. Pan-London Assertive Outreach Study, part 3.伦敦的积极外展团队:患者特征与治疗结果。泛伦敦积极外展研究,第3部分。
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;183:148-54. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.2.148.
4
Community treatment orders and reduced time in hospital: a nationwide study, 2007-2012.社区治疗令与缩短住院时间:一项2007 - 2012年的全国性研究
BJPsych Bull. 2016 Jun;40(3):124-6. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.115.051045.
5
How clinicians make decisions about CTOs in ACT: a qualitative study.临床医生如何在抗栓治疗中对慢性完全闭塞病变做出决策:一项定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2018 Sep 22;12:51. doi: 10.1186/s13033-018-0230-2. eCollection 2018.
6
Assertive outreach teams in London: staff experiences and perceptions. Pan-London Assertive Outreach Study, part 2.伦敦的主动外展团队:工作人员的经历与看法。泛伦敦主动外展研究,第2部分。
Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Aug;183:139-47. doi: 10.1192/bjp.183.2.139.
7
A systematic review of the views and experiences of subjects of community treatment orders.社区治疗令对象的观点和经验的系统回顾。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 May-Jun;52:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2017.03.002. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
8
Impact of diagnosis on outcomes for compulsory treatment orders in New Zealand.诊断对新西兰强制治疗令结果的影响。
BJPsych Open. 2022 Aug 1;8(5):e145. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.547.
9
10
Community treatment orders: relationship to clinical care, medication compliance, behavioural disturbance and readmission.社区治疗令:与临床护理、药物依从性、行为障碍及再入院的关系
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;34(5):801-8. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2000.00813.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital Utilization Outcomes Following Assignment to Outpatient Commitment.门诊承诺分配后的医院利用结果。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 Nov;48(6):942-961. doi: 10.1007/s10488-021-01112-y. Epub 2021 Feb 3.
2
The utility of outpatient civil commitment: Investigating the evidence.门诊民事强制收治的效用:证据调查。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 May-Jun;70:101565. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101565. Epub 2020 May 23.
3
Community treatment orders and associations with readmission rates and duration of psychiatric hospital admission: a controlled electronic case register study.社区治疗令与再入院率和精神科住院时间的关联:一项对照电子病例登记研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 5;10(3):e035121. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035121.
4
Compulsory community treatment to reduce readmission to hospital and increase engagement with community care in people with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.强制社区治疗以减少精神疾病患者再次入院并提高其对社区护理的参与度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;5(12):1013-1022. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30382-1. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
5
Community treatment orders in England: review of usage from national data.英格兰的社区治疗令:基于国家数据的使用情况回顾
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Oct;42(5):218. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2018.65.
6
Community treatment orders in England: review of usage from national data.英格兰的社区治疗令:基于国家数据的使用情况回顾
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Jun;42(3):119-122. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2017.33. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
7
Responsibilities with conflicting priorities: a qualitative study of ACT providers' experiences with community treatment orders.职责优先级相互冲突:对社区治疗令下积极社区治疗服务提供者经历的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 18;18(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3097-7.
8
Switching away from pipotiazine palmitate: a naturalistic study.从棕榈酸哌泊噻嗪转换治疗:一项自然主义研究。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2017 Jan;7(1):25-28. doi: 10.1177/2045125316672575. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
9
Recall of patients on community treatment orders over three years in the OCTET CTO cohort.在OCTET社区治疗令队列中对接受社区治疗令三年以上的患者进行召回。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1102-4.
10
What does being on a community treatment orders entail? A 3-year follow-up of the OCTET CTO cohort.接受社区治疗令意味着什么?对OCTET社区治疗令队列的3年随访。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Apr;52(4):465-472. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1304-6. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial.社区治疗令对精神病患者的影响(OCTET):一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1627-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
2
How patients in New Zealand view community treatment orders.新西兰患者如何看待社区治疗令。
J Ment Health. 2005;14(4):357-68. doi: 10.1080/09638230500229541.
3
Community treatment orders and antipsychotic long-acting injections.社区治疗令与抗精神病长效注射剂
Br J Psychiatry Suppl. 2009 Nov;52:S57-62. doi: 10.1192/bjp.195.52.s57.
4
Randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment: 3-year outcomes.积极社区治疗的随机评估:3年结果
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):81-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059303.
5
End of the road for treatment-as-usual studies?常规治疗研究之路走到尽头了吗?
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):5-6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062968.
6
Community treatment orders are not a good thing.社区治疗令不是一件好事。
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;193(2):96-100. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.049072.
7
A qualitative analysis of the use of community treatment orders in Saskatchewan.对萨斯喀彻温省社区治疗令使用情况的定性分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;29(6):516-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.06.001. Epub 2006 Nov 1.
8
The REACT study: randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment in north London.REACT研究:伦敦北部积极社区治疗的随机评估。
BMJ. 2006 Apr 8;332(7545):815-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C. Epub 2006 Mar 16.
9
Involuntary outpatient commitment, community treatment orders, and assisted outpatient treatment: what's in the data?非自愿门诊治疗、社区治疗令和辅助门诊治疗:数据中有什么?
Can J Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;49(9):585-91. doi: 10.1177/070674370404900903.
10
How mental health clinicians view community treatment orders: a national New Zealand survey.心理健康临床医生如何看待社区治疗令:一项新西兰全国性调查。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;38(10):836-41. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01470.x.