Killaspy Helen, Kingett Stella, Bebbington Paul, Blizard Robert, Johnson Sonia, Nolan Fiona, Pilling Stephen, King Michael
Department of Mental Health Sciences, UCL Medical School, Hampstead Campus, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):81-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059303.
The only randomised controlled trial to test high-fidelity assertive community treatment (ACT) in the UK (the Randomised Evaluation of Assertive Community Treatment (REACT) study) found no advantage over usual care from community mental health teams in reducing the need for in-patient care and in other clinical outcomes, but participants found ACT more acceptable and engaged better with it. One possible reason for the lack of efficacy of ACT might be the short period of follow-up (18 months in the REACT study). This paper reports on participants' service contact, in-patient service use and adverse events 36 months after randomisation.
在英国唯一一项测试高保真积极社区治疗(ACT)的随机对照试验(积极社区治疗随机评估(REACT)研究)发现,在减少住院护理需求和其他临床结果方面,与社区心理健康团队的常规护理相比并无优势,但参与者认为ACT更易接受且参与度更高。ACT缺乏疗效的一个可能原因可能是随访期较短(REACT研究为18个月)。本文报告了随机分组36个月后参与者的服务接触、住院服务使用情况及不良事件。