Mitchell Alex J, Gill John
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust and University of Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester, UK.
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):19-23. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.042630.
Aims and method To examine research productivity of staff working across 57 National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts in England. We examined research productivity between 2010 and 2012, including funded portfolio studies and all research (funded and unfunded). Results Across 57 trusts there were 1297 National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) studies in 2011/2012, involving 46 140 participants and in the same year staff in these trusts published 1334 articles (an average of only 23.4 per trust per annum). After correcting for trust size and budget, the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust was the most productive. In terms of funded portfolio studies, Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust as well as South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust and Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust had the strongest performance in 2011/2012. Clinical implications Trusts should aim to capitalise on valuable staff resources and expertise and better support and encourage research in the NHS to help improve clinical services.
目的与方法 考察英格兰57家国民健康服务体系（NHS）精神卫生信托机构工作人员的研究产出。我们研究了2010年至2012年期间的研究产出，包括获得资助的组合研究以及所有研究（包括资助和未资助的）。结果 在57家信托机构中，2011/2012年有1297项英国国家卫生研究院（NIHR）的研究，涉及46140名参与者，同年这些信托机构的工作人员发表了1334篇文章（平均每个信托机构每年仅23.4篇）。在对信托机构规模和预算进行校正后，南伦敦和莫兹利NHS基金会信托机构的产出最高。在获得资助的组合研究方面，曼彻斯特精神卫生与社会关怀信托机构以及南伦敦和莫兹利NHS基金会信托机构、牛津健康NHS基金会信托机构和剑桥郡及彼得伯勒NHS基金会信托机构在2011/2012年表现最为突出。临床意义 各信托机构应致力于利用宝贵的员工资源和专业知识，更好地支持和鼓励NHS中的研究工作，以帮助改善临床服务。
