Scantlebury Claire E, Perkins Elizabeth, Pinchbeck Gina L, Archer Debra C, Christley Robert M
BMC Vet Res. 2014;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-S1-S1. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
Little is known about lay understanding and decision making in response to colic. Horse-owners/carers are key to identifying colic and initiating veterinary intervention. Understanding how owners think and act in relation to colic could assist veterinary surgeons in tailoring information about colic with the aim of improving colic outcomes.
A mixed methods approach was employed including qualitative in-depth interviews and a cross-sectional questionnaire. Qualitative data were analysed using Grounded theory to conceptualise processes involved in horse-owner management of colic. Following this, a cross-sectional survey was designed to test these concepts. Cluster analysis explored the role of the human-horse relationship upon colic management strategies.
Fifteen horse-owners with a range of colic experience participated in the interviews. A theoretical conceptual model was developed and described how horse-owners' recognised, assessed and responded to colic. Three main management strategies were used including 'wait and see', 'lay treatments' and 'seek veterinary assistance'. Actions in response to colic were moderated by owners' experience of colic and interpretation of the severity of colic signs. A postal questionnaire gathered data from 673 horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The majority (605, 89.9%) of respondents were female. Cluster analysis revealed 5 meaningful groups of horse-owners based upon assessment of questionnaire items on the human-horse relationship. These groups included 2 professional and 3 amateur owner typologies. There were differences in the responses to some questionnaire items among the identified groups.
This study describes lay understanding and management of colic among a population of horse-owners from the North-West of the UK. The information may serve as a basis upon which to tailor existing programmes designed to educate owners about colic management strategies, and may inform veterinarians' interactions with horse-owners.
对于普通民众对马疝痛的理解以及应对决策了解甚少。马主/饲养者是识别马疝痛并启动兽医干预的关键。了解马主在马疝痛方面的思维和行为方式有助于兽医针对性地提供有关马疝痛的信息,从而改善马疝痛的治疗效果。
采用混合方法,包括定性深入访谈和横断面问卷调查。定性数据采用扎根理论进行分析,以概念化马主管理马疝痛所涉及的过程。在此基础上,设计了一项横断面调查来检验这些概念。聚类分析探讨了人马关系在马疝痛管理策略中的作用。
15名有不同马疝痛经历的马主参与了访谈。构建了一个理论概念模型,描述了马主如何识别、评估和应对马疝痛。主要采用了三种管理策略,包括“观望”、“自行治疗”和“寻求兽医帮助”。对马疝痛的应对行动受马主的马疝痛经历以及对疝痛症状严重程度的解读影响。通过邮寄问卷从英国西北部的673名马主那里收集了数据。大多数受访者(605人,89.9%)为女性。聚类分析根据对人马关系问卷项目的评估,揭示了5个有意义的马主群体。这些群体包括2种专业马主类型和3种业余马主类型。在已识别的群体中,对一些问卷项目的回答存在差异。
本研究描述了英国西北部一群马主对马疝痛的普通理解和管理方式。这些信息可作为调整现有旨在教育马主马疝痛管理策略的项目的基础,并可能为兽医与马主的互动提供参考。