• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于腹腔镜肝切除术的新型难度评分系统。

A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.

作者信息

Ban Daisuke, Tanabe Minoru, Ito Hiromitsu, Otsuka Yuichiro, Nitta Hiroyuki, Abe Yuta, Hasegawa Yasushi, Katagiri Toshio, Takagi Chisato, Itano Osamu, Kaneko Hironori, Wakabayashi Go

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):745-53. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.166.

DOI:10.1002/jhbp.166
PMID:25242563
Abstract

Early on, laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) was limited to partial resection, but major LLR is no longer rare. A difficulty scoring system is required to guide surgeons in advancing from simple to highly technical laparoscopic resections. Subjects were 90 patients who had undergone pure LLR at three medical institutions (30 patients/institution) from January 2011 to April 2014. Surgical difficulty was assessed by the operator using an index of 1-10 with the following divisions: 1-3 low difficulty, 4-6 intermediate difficulty, and 7-10 high difficulty. Weighted kappa statistic was used to calculate the concordance between the operators' and reviewers' (expert surgeon) difficulty index. Inter-rater agreement (weighted kappa statistic) between the operators' and reviewers' assessments was 0.89 with the three-level difficulty index and 0.80 with the 10-level difficulty index. A 10-level difficulty index by linear modeling based on clinical information revealed a weighted kappa statistic of 0.72 and that scored by the extent of liver resection, tumor location, tumor size, liver function, and tumor proximity to major vessels revealed a weighted kappa statistic of 0.68. We proposed a new scoring system to predict difficulty of various LLRs preoperatively. The calculated score well reflected difficulty.

摘要

早期,腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)仅限于部分切除,但大型LLR已不再罕见。需要一个难度评分系统来指导外科医生从简单的腹腔镜切除手术向高难度的手术推进。研究对象为2011年1月至2014年4月在三家医疗机构(每家机构30例患者)接受单纯LLR的90例患者。手术难度由术者使用1 - 10分的指数进行评估,划分如下:1 - 3分为低难度,4 - 6分为中等难度,7 - 10分为高难度。采用加权kappa统计量计算术者与评审者(专家外科医生)难度指数之间的一致性。术者与评审者评估之间的组间一致性(加权kappa统计量)在三级难度指数下为0.89,在十级难度指数下为0.80。基于临床信息通过线性建模得出的十级难度指数的加权kappa统计量为0.72,根据肝切除范围、肿瘤位置、肿瘤大小、肝功能以及肿瘤与主要血管的接近程度评分得出的加权kappa统计量为0.68。我们提出了一种新的评分系统,用于术前预测各种LLR的难度。计算出的分数能很好地反映难度。

相似文献

1
A novel difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic liver resection.一种用于腹腔镜肝切除术的新型难度评分系统。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):745-53. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.166.
2
The difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection.腹腔镜肝切除术的难点。
Updates Surg. 2015 Jun;67(2):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0302-7. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
3
Laparoscopic Liver Resection Difficulty Score-a Validation Study.腹腔镜肝切除难度评分的验证研究。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Mar;23(3):545-555. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4036-y. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
4
A novel model for prediction of pure laparoscopic liver resection surgical difficulty.一种用于预测纯腹腔镜肝切除术手术难度的新模型。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5356-5363. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5616-8. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
5
Clinical Utility of the Difficulty Scoring System for Predicting Surgical Time of Laparoscopic Liver Resection.预测腹腔镜肝切除手术时间的难度评分系统的临床应用价值。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Sep;26(9):702-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0135. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
6
The external validation of a difficulty scoring system for predicting the risk of intraoperative complications during laparoscopic liver resection.用于预测腹腔镜肝切除术中并发症风险的难度评分系统的外部验证
BMC Surg. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0645-y.
7
International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection.腹腔镜下肝大部切除术的国际经验
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):732-6. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.140. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
8
Clinical Practicality Study of the Difficulty Scoring Systems DSS-B and DSS-ER in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.腹腔镜肝切除术中难度评分系统DSS-B和DSS-ER的临床实用性研究
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Jan;29(1):12-18. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0150. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
9
International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection: a web-based study on the global diffusion of laparoscopic liver surgery prior to the 2nd International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection in Iwate, Japan.腹腔镜肝切除术技术层面的国际调查:一项基于网络的关于日本岩手县第二届腹腔镜肝切除国际共识会议之前腹腔镜肝手术全球传播情况的研究。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):737-44. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.141. Epub 2014 Aug 3.
10
Are the current difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver surgery telling the whole story? An international survey and recommendations for the future.腹腔镜肝脏手术当前的难度评分能说明全部情况吗?一项国际调查及对未来的建议。
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Mar;20(3):231-236. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.08.028. Epub 2017 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Indocyanine green fluorescence navigation in robotic liver segmentectomies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人肝脏段切除术的吲哚菁绿荧光导航:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 14;19(1):603. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02687-6.
2
Evaluation of outcomes of robotic liver surgery using the IWATE criteria.使用岩手标准评估机器人肝脏手术的结果。
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Aug 1;14(4):575-586. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-24-379. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
3
Implications of the surgical approach for complex liver resection in the era of enhanced recovery programs: a critical appraisal of the "Orange Segments" randomized controlled trial.
快速康复计划时代复杂肝切除术手术入路的影响:对“橙色肝段”随机对照试验的批判性评价
Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2025 Aug 1;14(4):634-638. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-2025-265. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
4
Surgical classification of segment VIII: an anatomical model guiding tailored hepatectomy approaches (with video).肝段VIII的手术分类:一种指导个体化肝切除方法的解剖学模型(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12124-2.
5
Laparoscopic resection combined with ablation for multiple colorectal liver metastases: a multicentre propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜切除术联合消融治疗多发性结直肠癌肝转移:一项多中心倾向匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12040-5.
6
Lapdoctor: Multicentre Validation of a Scoring System for Preoperative Evaluation of Difficulty of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.Lapdoctor:腹腔镜供体肾切除术难度术前评估评分系统的多中心验证
Transpl Int. 2025 Apr 23;38:14100. doi: 10.3389/ti.2025.14100. eCollection 2025.
7
Indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI) in difficult laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.吲哚菁绿荧光成像(ICG-FI)在困难的肝细胞癌腹腔镜肝切除术中的应用:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3400-3411. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11707-3. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
8
A new framework for tailoring laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Integrating preoperative clinical factors with surgical difficulty based on the Tokyo Guidelines 2018.一种定制腹腔镜胆囊切除术的新框架:基于《2018东京指南》将术前临床因素与手术难度相结合。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2025 Jun;32(6):452-464. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.12145. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
9
Intraoperative Cholangiogram Interpretation for Laparoscopic Transcystic Bile Duct Exploration: Is Concurrence Possible?腹腔镜经胆囊管胆管探查术中胆管造影解读:能否达成一致?
Ann Surg Open. 2025 Feb 11;6(1):e543. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000543. eCollection 2025 Mar.
10
Multicenter Belgian prospective registry on minimally invasive and open liver surgery (BReLLS): experience from 1342 consecutive cases.比利时多中心微创与开放肝脏手术前瞻性注册研究(BReLLS):1342例连续病例的经验
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 3;410(1):86. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03661-4.