Suppr超能文献

研究者回顾性分析了多西他赛治疗失败的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者序贯应用卡巴他赛和醋酸阿比特龙的疗效。

CAST: A retrospective analysis of cabazitaxel and abiraterone acetate sequential treatment in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer previously treated with docetaxel.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 15;136(6):E760-72. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29231. Epub 2014 Oct 3.

Abstract

Cabazitaxel and abiraterone have both received approval for treating metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients after first-line docetaxel therapy. In the cabazitaxel and abiraterone sequential treatment (CAST) study, the clinical outcome of docetaxel-treated mCRPC patients treated sequentially with both cabazitaxel and abiraterone was studied. Data were collected retrospectively from mCRPC patients at 12 hospitals across the Netherlands who initiated cabazitaxel and/or abiraterone before December 2012. Primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); secondary measures were progression-free survival (PFS), biochemical PFS, and best clinical and PSA response. Hospital admission data during treatment were collected, as well as toxicities resulting in treatment discontinuation or patient death. Sixty-three and 69 patients received Cab→Abi (cabazitaxel prior to abiraterone) and Abi→Cab before July 10th, 2013, respectively. Median OS was 19.1 months and 17.0 months in Cab→Abi and Abi→Cab treated patients, respectively (p = 0.369). Median PFS and biochemical PFS were significantly longer in Cab→Abi treated patients: 8.1 versus 6.5 (p = 0.050) and 9.5 versus 7.7 months (p = 0.024), respectively. Although partial responses to cabazitaxel occurred in both groups, Abi→Cab treated patients had a significantly decreased antitumor response from cabazitaxel than Cab→Abi treated patients (median PFS 5.0 versus 2.6 months, p < 0.001). Minor differences in toxicities were observed based on therapy sequence; generally, toxicity from cabazitaxel could be severe, while abiraterone toxicity was milder. This retrospective analysis indicates that primary progression on cabazitaxel or abiraterone did not preclude a response to the other agent in mCRPC patients. However, tumor response of both agents, particularly cabazitaxel, was lower when administered as higher-line therapy in the selected study population.

摘要

卡巴他赛和阿比特龙均已获得批准,可用于治疗一线多西紫杉醇治疗后转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者。在卡巴他赛和阿比特龙序贯治疗(CAST)研究中,研究了接受多西紫杉醇治疗的 mCRPC 患者序贯使用卡巴他赛和阿比特龙的临床结局。从荷兰 12 家医院接受卡巴他赛和/或阿比特龙治疗的 mCRPC 患者中回顾性收集数据,这些患者于 2012 年 12 月前开始治疗。主要结局指标为总生存期(OS);次要指标为无进展生存期(PFS)、生化无进展生存期和最佳临床和 PSA 反应。收集了治疗期间的住院数据,以及导致治疗中断或患者死亡的毒性反应。分别有 63 名和 69 名患者在 2013 年 7 月 10 日前接受了 Cab→Abi(卡巴他赛在前,阿比特龙在后)和 Abi→Cab 治疗。Cab→Abi 和 Abi→Cab 治疗患者的中位 OS 分别为 19.1 个月和 17.0 个月(p = 0.369)。Cab→Abi 治疗患者的中位 PFS 和生化无进展生存期显著延长:8.1 个月对比 6.5 个月(p = 0.050)和 9.5 个月对比 7.7 个月(p = 0.024)。尽管两组均观察到卡巴他赛的部分缓解,但 Abi→Cab 治疗患者的抗肿瘤反应明显低于 Cab→Abi 治疗患者(中位 PFS 5.0 个月对比 2.6 个月,p < 0.001)。根据治疗顺序观察到毒性的细微差异;一般来说,卡巴他赛的毒性可能很严重,而阿比特龙的毒性较轻。这项回顾性分析表明,在 mCRPC 患者中,卡巴他赛或阿比特龙的原发性进展并不排除对另一药物的反应。然而,在选定的研究人群中,作为二线治疗使用时,两种药物的肿瘤反应均较低,尤其是卡巴他赛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验