University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 30;15(9):e0239686. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239686. eCollection 2020.
A significant proportion of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harbor mutations in homologous recombination (HR) repair genes, with some of these mutations associating with increased tumor susceptibility to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum-based chemotherapy. While mutations in some HR repair genes (e.g., BRCA1/2) have been associated with a more aggressive clinical course, prior studies correlating HR mutational status with treatment response to androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) or taxane-based chemotherapy have yielded conflicting results.
We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis to assess clinical outcomes to conventional, regulatory-approved therapies in mCRPC patients with somatic (monoallelic and biallelic) and/or germline HR repair mutations compared to patients without alterations as determined by clinical-grade next-generation sequencing assays. The primary endpoint was PSA30/PSA50 response, defined as ≥30%/≥50% prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction from baseline. Secondary endpoints of PSA progression-free survival (pPFS) and clinical/radiographic progression-free survival (crPFS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.
A total of 90 consecutively selected patients were included in this analysis, of which 33 (37%) were identified to have HR repair gene mutations. Age, race, Gleason score, prior surgery, and receipt of prior radiation therapy were comparable between carriers and non-carriers. There was no evidence that PSA30/PSA50 differed by HR gene mutational status. Median pPFS and crPFS ranged 3-14 months across treatment modalities, but there was no evidence either differed by HR gene mutational status (all p>0.05). There was also no difference in outcomes between those with BRCA2 or PALB2 mutations (n = 17) compared to those without HR repair mutations.
HR gene mutational status was associated with comparable clinical outcomes following treatment with ARSIs or taxane-based chemotherapy. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
相当一部分转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者存在同源重组(HR)修复基因的突变,其中一些突变与多聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂和铂类化疗的肿瘤易感性增加有关。虽然一些 HR 修复基因(如 BRCA1/2)的突变与更具侵袭性的临床过程相关,但之前关于 HR 突变状态与雄激素受体(AR)信号抑制剂(ARSIs)或紫杉烷类化疗治疗反应相关性的研究结果相互矛盾。
我们进行了一项单中心回顾性分析,评估了与体细胞(单等位和双等位)和/或种系 HR 修复基因突变的 mCRPC 患者相比,无改变的患者接受常规、监管批准的治疗方案的临床结局,这些改变是通过临床级别的下一代测序检测确定的。主要终点是 PSA30/PSA50 反应,定义为与基线相比前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)降低≥30%/≥50%。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法估计 PSA 无进展生存期(pPFS)和临床/影像学无进展生存期(crPFS)的次要终点。
本分析共纳入 90 例连续选择的患者,其中 33 例(37%)被确定为 HR 修复基因突变。携带者和非携带者的年龄、种族、Gleason 评分、既往手术和接受放疗情况相似。没有证据表明 PSA30/PSA50 与 HR 基因突变状态不同。各种治疗方式的中位 pPFS 和 crPFS 范围为 3-14 个月,但没有证据表明 HR 基因突变状态存在差异(所有 p>0.05)。BRCA2 或 PALB2 突变(n=17)与无 HR 修复突变的患者相比,在结局方面也没有差异。
HR 基因突变状态与 ARSIs 或紫杉烷类化疗后的临床结局相当。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实这些发现。