• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

痛苦喜欢陪伴:团队不和谐与以主管为中心的人际公正氛围对团队凝聚力的影响。

Misery loves company: team dissonance and the influence of supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate on team cohesiveness.

机构信息

Department of Management.

Department of Management and Organization, University of Washington.

出版信息

J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1059-73. doi: 10.1037/a0037915. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

DOI:10.1037/a0037915
PMID:25243994
Abstract

The organizational justice literature has examined the effects of supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate, or a team's shared perception of the dignity and respect it receives from its supervisor, on a number of important outcomes directed at organizational authorities. Considerably less is known about the potential influence of these shared perceptions on coworker-directed outcomes. In 2 experiments, we predict that a low (unfair) supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate generates greater team cohesiveness than a high (fair) supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate. We further examine the process through which this effect occurs. Drawing from cognitive dissonance theory, we predict that low (vs. high) supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate generates greater team dissonance, or shared psychological discomfort, for team members and that this dissonance serves as an underlying mechanism through which supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate influences a team's cohesiveness. Our results demonstrate support for these predictions in that low supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate led to higher levels of both team dissonance and team cohesiveness than did high supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate, and team dissonance mediated this relationship. Implications and areas for future research are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

组织公正文献研究了以主管为中心的人际公正氛围,或团队对其主管给予的尊严和尊重的共同感知,对许多针对组织权威的重要结果的影响。关于这些共同看法对同事导向结果的潜在影响,人们知之甚少。在 2 项实验中,我们预测低(不公平)的以主管为中心的人际公正氛围比高(公平)的以主管为中心的人际公正氛围产生更大的团队凝聚力。我们进一步研究了这种效应发生的过程。从认知失调理论出发,我们预测低(高)的以主管为中心的人际公正氛围会为团队成员产生更大的团队不和谐,或共同的心理不适,而这种不和谐是主管为中心的人际公正氛围影响团队凝聚力的潜在机制。我们的研究结果表明,低的以主管为中心的人际公正氛围导致了更高水平的团队不和谐和团队凝聚力,而高的以主管为中心的人际公正氛围则没有,并且团队不和谐中介了这种关系。讨论了这些发现的含义和未来研究的方向。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2014 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Misery loves company: team dissonance and the influence of supervisor-focused interpersonal justice climate on team cohesiveness.痛苦喜欢陪伴:团队不和谐与以主管为中心的人际公正氛围对团队凝聚力的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1059-73. doi: 10.1037/a0037915. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
2
The impact of justice climate and justice orientation on work outcomes: a cross-level multifoci framework.公平氛围和公平取向对工作成果的影响:一个跨层次多焦点框架。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Mar;90(2):242-56. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.2.242.
3
Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a cross-level investigation.仆人式领导、程序公正氛围、服务氛围、员工态度和组织公民行为:跨层次调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):517-29. doi: 10.1037/a0018867.
4
Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach.上级感知的互动公平的涓滴效应:有调节的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jul;98(4):678-89. doi: 10.1037/a0032080. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
5
Climate uniformity: its influence on team communication quality, task conflict, and team performance.气候一致性:其对团队沟通质量、任务冲突和团队绩效的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1042-58. doi: 10.1037/a0037868. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
6
Mediating effect of cooperative norm in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors from procedural justice climate.合作规范在程序公正氛围预测组织公民行为中的中介作用。
Psychol Rep. 2007 Aug;101(1):67-78. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.1.67-78.
7
Employee conscientiousness, agreeableness, and supervisor justice rule compliance: A three-study investigation.员工尽责性、宜人性和主管公正规则遵守:三项研究的调查。
J Appl Psychol. 2017 Nov;102(11):1564-1589. doi: 10.1037/apl0000248. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Examining retaliatory responses to justice violations and recovery attempts in teams.考察团队中对不公正行为的报复反应和恢复尝试。
J Appl Psychol. 2012 Nov;97(6):1218-32. doi: 10.1037/a0029450. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
9
The role of proactive personality in job satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior: a relational perspective.主动人格在工作满意度和组织公民行为中的作用:关系视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2010 Mar;95(2):395-404. doi: 10.1037/a0018079.
10
Ethical leadership as a substitute for justice enactment: An information-processing perspective.伦理型领导对实施公正的替代作用:信息加工的视角。
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Sep;104(9):1103-1116. doi: 10.1037/apl0000403. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Why Don't I Help You? The Relationship between Role Stressors and Helping Behavior from a Cognitive Dissonance Perspective.为什么我不帮你?从认知失调的角度看角色压力源与助人行为之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jan 24;8:2220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02220. eCollection 2017.