Adamczyk Przemysław, Tworkiewicz Jakub, Drewa Tomasz
Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital in Toruń, Department of General and Oncologic Urology, Toruń, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital in Toruń, Department of General and Oncologic Urology, Toruń, Poland ; Regenerative Medicine Engineering Department, Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Cent European J Urol. 2014;67(3):235-41. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2014.03.art5. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
The main treatment methods of prostate carcinoma are surgery and radiation therapy, both having serious side effects. Because of these side effects, the idea of organ preserving therapy emerged. Rationale to perform focal therapy is to preserve the prostate gland, along with potency and continence, offering good cancer control with appropriate treatment. The idea of gland sparing therapy is quite controversial. Presently, EAU Guidelines propose focal therapy as experimental in the treatment of prostate carcinoma.
The aim of the study was to asses how many patients could be qualified for focal therapy, according to post prostatectomy pathological findings. 720 patients suspected of prostate cancer were biopsied. In 324 patients, prostate carcinoma was revealed, of which 81 were subjected to radical prostatectomy. Pre and post-operative pathological results were analyzed, according to possible qualification for focal treatment.
According to the clinical evaluation of all the patients referred to the treatment, 25% could be assumed to have unifocal disease and could be qualified to the focal treatment. Post-operative evaluation revealed pT2b cancer in 5%, pT2c disease in 65%, and pT3a-pT4a disease in 20% of these patients. Cancer was unilateral (pT2a-b) in only 15% of cases, and was suitable for focal treatment (small disease not extending to whole lobe- pT2a disease) in only 10%.
It seems that with the use of current methods, proper T-staging of the disease and amount of neoplasmatic tissue inside the gland can not be reached with great certainty. In our opinion, focal therapy should not be used in patients with ≤pT2b and high risk disease. For them, radical treatment (surgery or radiation therapy) should be recommended. For the rest of the patients, with low risk disease, keeping in mind the large scale of possible overtreatment, active surveillance is a valid treatment option. Focal therapy can be an interesting therapeutic proposition for a small group of patients with pT2a cancer, but it is not possible to select them with big certainty with current methods of imaging medicine.
前列腺癌的主要治疗方法是手术和放射治疗,两者均有严重的副作用。由于这些副作用,器官保留疗法的理念应运而生。进行聚焦治疗的基本原理是保留前列腺以及性功能和控尿功能,通过适当的治疗实现良好的癌症控制。腺体保留疗法的理念颇具争议。目前,欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)指南将聚焦治疗提议为前列腺癌治疗中的实验性方法。
本研究的目的是根据前列腺切除术后的病理结果评估有多少患者适合聚焦治疗。对720例疑似前列腺癌的患者进行了活检。其中324例患者被确诊为前列腺癌,其中81例行根治性前列腺切除术。根据聚焦治疗的可能适用性分析术前和术后的病理结果。
根据所有接受治疗患者的临床评估,25%的患者可被认为患有单灶性疾病,有资格接受聚焦治疗。术后评估显示,这些患者中5%为pT2b期癌症,65%为pT2c期疾病,20%为pT3a - pT4a期疾病。仅15%的病例癌症为单侧(pT2a - b),仅10%适合聚焦治疗(疾病较小未累及整个叶 - pT2a期疾病)。
似乎采用目前的方法,无法非常确定地实现疾病的准确T分期以及腺体内部肿瘤组织的数量评估。我们认为,对于≤pT2b期和高危疾病的患者不应使用聚焦治疗。对于他们,应推荐根治性治疗(手术或放射治疗)。对于其余低危疾病的患者,鉴于可能存在的过度治疗范围较大,主动监测是一种有效的治疗选择。聚焦治疗对于一小部分pT2a期癌症患者可能是一个有趣的治疗方案,但用目前的医学成像方法无法非常确定地筛选出这些患者。