Kim Victor, Desai Parag, Newell John D, Make Barry J, Washko George R, Silverman Edwin K, Crapo James D, Bhatt Surya P, Criner Gerard J
Respir Res. 2014 Aug 8;15(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12931-014-0084-3.
Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is a common but variable phenomenon in COPD. The CT characteristics of airway dimensions that differentiate COPD subjects with BDR from those without BDR have not been well described. We aimed to assess airway dimensions in COPD subjects with and without BDR.
We analyzed subjects with GOLD 1-4 disease in the COPDGene® study who had CT airway analysis. We divided patients into two groups: BDR + (post bronchodilator ΔFEV1 ≥ 10%) and BDR-(post bronchodilator ΔFEV1 < 10%). The mean wall area percent (WA%) of six segmental bronchi in each subject was quantified using VIDA. Using 3D SLICER, airway wall thickness was also expressed as the square root wall area of an airway of 10 mm (Pi10) and 15 mm (Pi15) diameter. %Emphysema and %gas trapping were also calculated.
2355 subjects in the BDR-group and 1306 in the BDR + group formed our analysis. The BDR + group had a greater Pi10, Pi15, and mean segmental WA% compared to the BDR-group. In multivariate logistic regression using gender, race, current smoking, history of asthma, %emphysema, %gas trapping, %predicted FEV1, and %predicted FVC, airway wall measures remained independent predictors of BDR. Using a threshold change in FEV1 ≥ 15% and FEV1 ≥ 12% and 200 mL to divide patients into groups, the results were similar.
BDR in COPD is independently associated with CT evidence of airway pathology. This study provides us with greater evidence of changes in lung structure that correlate with physiologic manifestations of airflow obstruction in COPD.
支气管扩张剂反应性(BDR)在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中是一种常见但多变的现象。区分有BDR和无BDR的COPD患者的气道尺寸的CT特征尚未得到充分描述。我们旨在评估有和无BDR的COPD患者的气道尺寸。
我们分析了COPDGene®研究中患有GOLD 1-4级疾病且进行了CT气道分析的受试者。我们将患者分为两组:BDR+(支气管扩张剂后ΔFEV1≥10%)和BDR-(支气管扩张剂后ΔFEV1<10%)。使用VIDA对每个受试者的六个节段支气管的平均壁面积百分比(WA%)进行量化。使用3D Slicer,气道壁厚度也表示为直径10 mm(Pi10)和15 mm(Pi15)的气道的平方根壁面积。还计算了肺气肿百分比和气体潴留百分比。
BDR-组有2355名受试者,BDR+组有1306名受试者纳入我们的分析。与BDR-组相比,BDR+组的Pi10、Pi15和平均节段WA%更大。在使用性别、种族、当前吸烟情况、哮喘病史、肺气肿百分比、气体潴留百分比、预测FEV1百分比和预测FVC百分比进行的多变量逻辑回归中,气道壁测量值仍然是BDR的独立预测因素。使用FEV1≥15%、FEV1≥12%和200 mL的阈值变化将患者分组,结果相似。
COPD中的BDR与气道病理学的CT证据独立相关。本研究为与COPD气流阻塞的生理表现相关的肺结构变化提供了更多证据。