He B, Gong S, Hu C, Fan J, Qian J, Huang S, Cui L, Ji Y
1 Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.
Br J Radiol. 2014 Nov;87(1043):20140229. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140229. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
To compare the diagnostic capabilities between capsule endoscopy (CE) and multislice CT (MSCT) enterography in combination with MSCT angiography for assessment of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB).
A total of 127 patients with OGIB were looked at in this study. 82 patients (aged 42.7 ± 19.1 years; 34 males) were assigned to receive MSCT diagnosis and 67 patients to (aged 53.9 ± 16.2 years; 28 males) receive CE diagnosis. Among them, 22 patients (aged 54.1 ± 19.1 years; 12 males) received both examinations. Oral isotonic mannitol and intramuscular injection of anisodamine were performed; non-ionic contrast (iopromide, 370 mg I ml(-1)) was intravenously administered; and then multiphase scanning was conducted at arterial, small intestinal and portal venous phases in MSCT. The results were compared with findings of reference standards including double balloon enteroscopy, digital subtraction angiography, intraoperative pathological examination and/or clinical diagnosis.
Administration of anisodamine markedly increased the satisfaction rate of bowel filling (94.67% vs 28.57%; p < 0.001) but not the diagnostic yield (p = 0.293) of MSCT. Compared with MSCT, CE showed an improved overall diagnostic yield (68.66% vs 47.56%; p = 0.010), which was also observed in overt bleeding patients (i.e. patients with continued passage of visible blood) (76.19% vs 51.02%; p = 0.013) and in patients aged younger than 40 years of age (85% vs 51.28%; p = 0.024). However, CE had similar positive rates to MSCT (p > 0.05). Among the 22 cases in whom both examinations were conducted, CE showed no significantly different diagnostic capability compared with MSCT (p = 0.4597).
Both CE and MSCT are safe and effective diagnostic methods for OGIB.
CE is preferred for overt bleeding or patients aged younger than 40 years. The combined use of CE and MSCT is recommended in OGIB diagnosis.
比较胶囊内镜(CE)与多层螺旋CT(MSCT)小肠造影联合MSCT血管造影在不明原因消化道出血(OGIB)评估中的诊断能力。
本研究共纳入127例OGIB患者。82例患者(年龄42.7±19.1岁;男性34例)接受MSCT诊断,67例患者(年龄53.9±16.2岁;男性28例)接受CE诊断。其中,22例患者(年龄54.1±19.1岁;男性12例)接受了两种检查。口服等渗甘露醇并肌肉注射山莨菪碱;静脉注射非离子型对比剂(碘普罗胺,370 mg I ml⁻¹);然后在MSCT的动脉期、小肠期和门静脉期进行多期扫描。将结果与包括双气囊小肠镜、数字减影血管造影、术中病理检查和/或临床诊断在内的参考标准结果进行比较。
山莨菪碱的使用显著提高了肠道充盈的满意率(94.67%对28.57%;p<0.001),但未提高MSCT的诊断率(p=0.293)。与MSCT相比,CE的总体诊断率有所提高(68.66%对47.56%;p=0.010),在显性出血患者(即持续排出可见血液的患者)中也观察到这一情况(76.19%对51.02%;p=0.013),在年龄小于40岁的患者中也是如此(85%对51.28%;p=0.024)。然而,CE与MSCT的阳性率相似(p>0.05)。在接受两种检查的22例病例中,CE与MSCT相比诊断能力无显著差异(p=0.4597)。
CE和MSCT都是OGIB安全有效的诊断方法。
显性出血或年龄小于40岁的患者首选CE。OGIB诊断建议联合使用CE和MSCT。