Savolainen Jukka, Mason W Alex, Bolen Jonathan D, Chmelka Mary B, Hurtig Tuula, Ebeling Hanna, Nordström Tanja, Taanila Anja
School of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 321 Nebraska Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68588-0561, USA.
National Research Institute for Child and Family Studies, Boys Town, 14100 Crawford Street, Boys Town, Omaha, NE, 68010, USA.
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2015 Dec;25(5):375-88. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1931. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
Although a pathway from childhood behavioural disorders to criminal offending is well established, the aetiological processes remain poorly understood. Also, it is not clear if attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is predictive of crime in the absence of comorbid disruptive behaviour disorder (DBD).
We examined two research questions: (1) Does ADHD have a unique effect on the risk of criminal offending, independently of DBD? (2) Is the effect of childhood behavioural disorders on criminal offending direct or mediated by adolescent processes related to school experience, substance misuse and peers?
Structural equation modelling, with latent variables, was applied to longitudinally collected data on 4644 men from the 1986 Northern Finland Birth Cohort Study.
Both ADHD and DBD separately predicted felony conviction risk. Most of these effects were mediated by adolescent alcohol use and low academic performance. The effect of DBD was stronger and included a direct pathway to criminal offending.
Findings were more consistent with the life course mediation hypothesis of pathways into crime than the behavioural continuity path, in that the effects of each disorder category were mediated by heavy drinking and educational failure. Preventing these adolescent risk outcomes may be an effective approach to closing pathways to criminal behaviour amongst behaviourally disordered children. However, as there was some evidence of a direct pathway from DBD, effective treatments targeting this disorder are also expected to reduce criminal offending.
尽管从儿童期行为障碍到犯罪行为的路径已得到充分证实,但病因过程仍知之甚少。此外,在没有共病破坏性行为障碍(DBD)的情况下,注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是否能预测犯罪尚不清楚。
我们研究了两个研究问题:(1)ADHD对犯罪风险是否有独立于DBD的独特影响?(2)儿童期行为障碍对犯罪行为的影响是直接的,还是由与学校经历、药物滥用和同伴相关的青少年过程介导的?
采用带有潜在变量的结构方程模型,对1986年芬兰北部出生队列研究中4644名男性的纵向收集数据进行分析。
ADHD和DBD分别预测了重罪定罪风险。这些影响大多由青少年饮酒和学业成绩低介导。DBD的影响更强,包括一条通向犯罪行为的直接路径。
研究结果与犯罪行为路径的生命历程中介假说比行为连续性路径更一致,因为每种障碍类别的影响都由大量饮酒和教育失败介导。预防这些青少年风险结果可能是阻断行为障碍儿童犯罪行为路径的有效方法。然而,由于有一些证据表明存在从DBD出发的直接路径,针对这种障碍的有效治疗也有望减少犯罪行为。