Mackinnon David P, Lockwood Chondra M, Williams Jason
Arizona State University.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Jan 1;39(1):99. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4.
The most commonly used method to test an indirect effect is to divide the estimate of the indirect effect by its standard error and compare the resulting z statistic with a critical value from the standard normal distribution. Confidence limits for the indirect effect are also typically based on critical values from the standard normal distribution. This article uses a simulation study to demonstrate that confidence limits are imbalanced because the distribution of the indirect effect is normal only in special cases. Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: (a) a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and (b) resampling methods. In Study 1, confidence limits based on the distribution of the product are more accurate than methods based on an assumed normal distribution but confidence limits are still imbalanced. Study 2 demonstrates that more accurate confidence limits are obtained using resampling methods, with the bias-corrected bootstrap the best method overall.
检验间接效应最常用的方法是将间接效应的估计值除以其标准误,并将所得的z统计量与标准正态分布的临界值进行比较。间接效应的置信区间通常也基于标准正态分布的临界值。本文通过一项模拟研究表明,置信区间是不平衡的,因为间接效应的分布仅在特殊情况下才呈正态分布。本文评估了两种改善间接效应置信区间性能的替代方法:(a) 一种基于两个正态随机变量乘积分布的方法,以及 (b) 重抽样方法。在研究1中,基于乘积分布的置信区间比基于假定正态分布的方法更准确,但置信区间仍然不平衡。研究2表明,使用重抽样方法可获得更准确的置信区间,其中偏差校正自助法总体上是最佳方法。