Sherriff Rosemary L, Platt Rutherford V, Veblen Thomas T, Schoennagel Tania L, Gartner Meredith H
Department of Geography, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California, United States of America.
Department of Environmental Studies, Gettysburg College, Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 24;9(9):e106971. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106971. eCollection 2014.
Large recent fires in the western U.S. have contributed to a perception that fire exclusion has caused an unprecedented occurrence of uncharacteristically severe fires, particularly in lower elevation dry pine forests. In the absence of long-term fire severity records, it is unknown how short-term trends compare to fire severity prior to 20th century fire exclusion. This study compares historical (i.e. pre-1920) fire severity with observed modern fire severity and modeled potential fire behavior across 564,413 ha of montane forests of the Colorado Front Range. We used forest structure and tree-ring fire history to characterize fire severity at 232 sites and then modeled historical fire-severity across the entire study area using biophysical variables. Eighteen (7.8%) sites were characterized by low-severity fires and 214 (92.2%) by mixed-severity fires (i.e. including moderate- or high-severity fires). Difference in area of historical versus observed low-severity fire within nine recent (post-1999) large fire perimeters was greatest in lower montane forests. Only 16% of the study area recorded a shift from historical low severity to a higher potential for crown fire today. An historical fire regime of more frequent and low-severity fires at low elevations (<2260 m) supports a convergence of management goals of ecological restoration and fire hazard mitigation in those habitats. In contrast, at higher elevations mixed-severity fires were predominant historically and continue to be so today. Thinning treatments at higher elevations of the montane zone will not return the fire regime to an historic low-severity regime, and are of questionable effectiveness in preventing severe wildfires. Based on present-day fuels, predicted fire behavior under extreme fire weather continues to indicate a mixed-severity fire regime throughout most of the montane forest zone. Recent large wildfires in the Front Range are not fundamentally different from similar events that occurred historically under extreme weather conditions.
美国西部近期发生的大规模火灾让人觉得,禁止火灾发生导致了前所未有的、异常严重火灾的出现,尤其是在低海拔的干燥松树林中。由于缺乏长期的火灾严重程度记录,目前尚不清楚短期趋势与20世纪禁止火灾发生之前的火灾严重程度相比如何。本研究比较了科罗拉多前山山脉564,413公顷山地森林的历史(即1920年以前)火灾严重程度、观测到的现代火灾严重程度以及模拟的潜在火灾行为。我们利用森林结构和树木年轮火灾历史来描述232个地点的火灾严重程度,然后使用生物物理变量对整个研究区域的历史火灾严重程度进行建模。18个(7.8%)地点的火灾特征为低强度火灾,214个(92.2%)地点的火灾特征为混合强度火灾(即包括中度或高强度火灾)。在最近(1999年后)的9次大型火灾范围内,低海拔山地森林中历史低强度火灾与观测到的低强度火灾面积差异最大。研究区域中只有16%的地方记录到从历史低强度火灾转变为如今树冠火灾可能性更高的情况。低海拔(<2260米)地区更频繁、低强度火灾的历史火灾模式支持了这些栖息地生态恢复和减轻火灾隐患的管理目标的趋同。相比之下,在高海拔地区,历史上混合强度火灾占主导地位,如今仍然如此。在山地较高海拔地区进行间伐处理不会使火灾模式恢复到历史低强度模式,而且在预防严重野火方面的有效性存疑。根据目前的燃料情况,极端火灾天气下预测的火灾行为继续表明,大部分山地森林区域的火灾模式为混合强度火灾。前山山脉最近发生的大型野火与历史上在极端天气条件下发生的类似事件没有根本区别。