Suppr超能文献

对重症监护病房中谵妄危险因素的系统评价。

A systematic review of risk factors for delirium in the ICU.

作者信息

Zaal Irene J, Devlin John W, Peelen Linda M, Slooter Arjen J C

机构信息

1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 2School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. 3Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):40-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000625.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Although numerous risk factors for delirium in the ICU have been proposed, the strength of evidence supporting each risk factor remains unclear. This study systematically identifies risk factors for delirium in critically ill adults where current evidence is strongest.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies published from 2000 to February 2013 that evaluated critically ill adults, not undergoing cardiac surgery, for delirium, and used either multivariable analysis or randomization to evaluate variables as potential risk factors for delirium.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were abstracted in duplicate, and quality was scored using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network checklists (i.e., high, acceptable, and low). Using a best-evidence synthesis each variable was evaluated using 3 criteria: the number of studies investigating it, the quality of these studies, and whether the direction of association was consistent across the studies. Strengths of association were not summarized. Strength of evidence was defined as strong (consistent findings in ≥2 high quality studies), moderate (consistent findings in 1 high quality study and ≥1 acceptable quality studies), inconclusive (inconsistent findings or 1 high quality study or consistent findings in only acceptable quality/low quality studies) or no evidence available.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among 33 studies included, 70% were high quality. There was strong evidence that age, dementia, hypertension, pre-ICU emergency surgery or trauma, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, mechanical ventilation, metabolic acidosis, delirium on the prior day, and coma are risk factors for delirium, that gender is not associated with delirium, and that use of dexmedetomidine is associated with a lower delirium prevalence. There is moderate evidence that multiple organ failure is a risk factor for delirium.

CONCLUSIONS

Only 11 putative risk factors for delirium are supported by either strong or moderate level of evidence. These factors should be considered when designing delirium prevention strategies or controlling for confounding in future etiologic studies.

摘要

目的

尽管已提出众多重症监护病房(ICU)谵妄的危险因素,但支持各危险因素的证据强度仍不明确。本研究系统地识别当前证据最为充分的成年危重症患者谵妄的危险因素。

数据来源

护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库及Cochrane系统评价数据库。

研究选择

2000年至2013年2月发表的评估未接受心脏手术的成年危重症患者谵妄情况的研究,且采用多变量分析或随机化方法评估变量作为谵妄潜在危险因素的研究。

数据提取

数据由两人独立提取,并使用苏格兰校际指南网络清单(即高、可接受和低)进行质量评分。采用最佳证据综合法,每个变量依据三个标准进行评估:研究该变量的研究数量、这些研究的质量以及各研究中关联方向是否一致。未总结关联强度。证据强度定义为强(≥2项高质量研究结果一致)、中(1项高质量研究结果一致且≥1项可接受质量研究结果一致)、不确定(结果不一致或仅1项高质量研究或仅可接受质量/低质量研究结果一致)或无可用证据。

数据综合

纳入的33项研究中,70%为高质量研究。有充分证据表明年龄、痴呆、高血压、ICU前急诊手术或创伤、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)评分、机械通气、代谢性酸中毒、前一日谵妄及昏迷是谵妄的危险因素,性别与谵妄无关,右美托咪定的使用与谵妄患病率较低相关。有中等证据表明多器官功能衰竭是谵妄的危险因素。

结论

仅有11个假定的谵妄危险因素得到了强或中等水平证据的支持。在设计谵妄预防策略或在未来病因学研究中控制混杂因素时应考虑这些因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验