Sun L Y, Meng F G, Li Q, Zhao Z J, He C Z, Wang S P, Sa R L, Man W W, Wang L H
Center for Endemic Disease Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin Medical University, Key Lab of Etiology and Epidemiology, Education Bureau of Heilongjiang Province & Ministry of Health (23618504), Harbin 150081, China.
Qinghai Provincial Institute for Endemic Disease Control, Xining, China.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Dec;22(12):2033-40. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
Based on the aetiological hypothesis of Kaschin-Beck disease (KBD), different interventions were adopted, and the preventive and therapeutic effects of interventions was observed and evaluated in this trial.
A total of 358 children from seven villages of Qinghai Province in China were examined, and 280 children aged 6-11 years old were eligible for the trial. The children were divided into three groups that received either no intervention (n = 64), 150 kg/person of rice from non-KBD areas (n = 103) or 7 kg/family of selenium-iodine salt (n = 113) for 12 months. Data were collected and used to calculate the proportion of patients with X-ray lesions, the proportion of new patients and the metaphyseal repair rate. All indicators were analysed with Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. The registration number of this trial is ChiCTR-PNRC-12002309 (http://www.chictr.org).
After interventions, the proportion of patients with X-ray lesions increased dramatically in the control group and decreased significantly in two intervention groups; significant differences were seen between the control group and two intervention groups (P < 0.05). Moreover, significant differences were observed in the proportions of new patients and the metaphyseal repair rates between the control group and two intervention groups (P < 0.05). Additionally, the proportion of new patients was lowest and the metaphyseal repair rate was highest in group B.
The effects of eating rice from non-KBD areas and selenium supplementation on the prevention and treatment of paediatric KBD were notable, the consumption of rice might be the most effective and safest intervention and should be encouraged.
基于大骨节病(KBD)的病因假说,采用不同干预措施,在本试验中观察并评估干预措施的预防和治疗效果。
对中国青海省7个村庄的358名儿童进行检查,280名6 - 11岁儿童符合试验条件。将儿童分为三组,分别为不进行干预组(n = 64)、食用来自非大骨节病病区的大米150公斤/人组(n = 103)或食用硒碘盐7公斤/家庭组(n = 113),干预12个月。收集数据并用于计算X线病变患者比例、新发病例比例和干骺端修复率。所有指标采用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行分析。本试验注册号为ChiCTR - PNRC - 12002309(http://www.chictr.org)。
干预后,对照组X线病变患者比例大幅上升,两个干预组显著下降;对照组与两个干预组之间存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。此外,对照组与两个干预组在新发病例比例和干骺端修复率方面也存在显著差异(P < 0.05)。另外,B组新发病例比例最低,干骺端修复率最高。
食用非大骨节病病区大米和补硒对小儿大骨节病的防治效果显著,食用大米可能是最有效、最安全的干预措施,应予以鼓励。