Suppr超能文献

肺炎预防降低重症监护病房死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Pneumonia prevention to decrease mortality in intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes University Hospital.

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Tenon University Hospital, University Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Jan 1;60(1):64-75. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu740. Epub 2014 Sep 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the strategies of prevention of hospital-acquired pneumonia that reduce mortality in intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

We followed PRISMA (Preferred Reported Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (through 10 June 2014) as well as reference lists of articles. We included all randomized controlled trials conducted in critically ill adult patients hospitalized in ICUs and evaluating digestive prophylactic methods (selective digestive decontamination [SDD], acidification of gastric content, early enteral feeding, prevention of microinhalation); circuit prophylactic methods (closed suctioning systems, early tracheotomy, aerosolized antibiotics, humidification, lung secretion drainage, silver-coated endotracheal tubes) or oropharyngeal prophylactic methods (selective oropharyngeal decontamination, patient position, sinusitis prophylaxis, subglottic secretion drainage, tracheal cuff monitoring). One reviewer extracted data that were checked by 3 others. The primary outcome was the mortality rate in the ICU.

RESULTS

We identified 157 randomized trials to pool in a meta-analysis. The primary outcome was available in 145 studies (n = 37 156). The risk ratio (RR) for death was 0.95 (95% confidence interval [CI], .92-.99; P = .02) in the intervention groups. In subgroup analysis, only SDD significantly decreased mortality compared with control (n = 10 227; RR, 0.84 [95% CI, .76-.92; P < .001]). The RR for in-ICU death was 0.78 (95% CI, .69-.89; P < .001; I(2) = 33%) in trials investigating SDD with systemic antimicrobial therapy and 1.00 (.84-1.21; P = .96; I(2) = 0%) without systemic antimicrobial therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective digestive decontamination with systemic antimicrobial therapy reduced mortality and should be considered in critically ill patients at high risk for death.

摘要

背景

确定降低重症监护病房(ICU)病死率的医院获得性肺炎预防策略。

方法

我们遵循 PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。我们检索了 MEDLINE 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记库(截至 2014 年 6 月 10 日)以及文章的参考文献列表。我们纳入了所有在 ICU 住院的危重症成年患者中进行的、评估消化道预防方法(选择性消化道去污染[SDD]、胃酸化、早期肠内喂养、预防微吸入;回路预防方法(密闭式吸痰系统、早期气管切开、雾化抗生素、湿化、肺分泌物引流、银涂层气管内导管)或口咽预防方法(选择性口咽去污染、患者体位、鼻窦炎预防、声门下分泌物引流、气管套囊监测)的随机对照试验。一位评审员提取数据,另外 3 位评审员进行核对。主要结局为 ICU 病死率。

结果

我们共确定了 157 项随机试验,以进行荟萃分析。145 项研究(n=37156)提供了主要结局数据。干预组的死亡风险比(RR)为 0.95(95%置信区间[CI],0.920.99;P=0.02)。亚组分析显示,仅 SDD 与对照组相比显著降低病死率(n=10227;RR,0.84[95%CI,0.760.92;P<0.001)。在研究 SDD 联合全身抗菌治疗的试验中,ICU 病死率的 RR 为 0.78(95%CI,0.690.89;P<0.001;I²=33%),而在未行全身抗菌治疗的试验中,RR 为 1.00(0.841.21;P=0.96;I²=0%)。

结论

在有较高死亡风险的危重症患者中,SDD 联合全身抗菌治疗可降低病死率,应予以考虑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验