• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在援助正统观念的边缘:巴西与莫桑比克在非洲生产基本药物的合作。

On the margins of aid orthodoxy: the Brazil-Mozambique collaboration to produce essential medicines in Africa.

作者信息

Russo Giuliano, de Oliveira Lícia, Shankland Alex, Sitoe Tânia

机构信息

International health and biostatistics department, Instituto de Higiene and Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Global Health. 2014 Sep 25;10:70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-014-0070-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12992-014-0070-z
PMID:25252701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4190436/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

On the back of its recent economic development and domestic success in the fight against HIV/AIDS, Brazil is helping the Government of Mozambique to set up a pharmaceutical factory as part of its South-South cooperation programme. Until recently, a consensus existed that pharmaceutical production in Africa was not viable or sustainable. This paper looks into practicalities and evolution of this collaboration to illustrate the characteristics of Brazilian development cooperation in health, with the aim of drawing lessons for the wider debate on aid and local production of pharmaceuticals in Africa.

DISCUSSION

We show that the project process has been very long and complex, has involved multiple public and private partners, and cost in excess of USD34 million. There have also been setbacks in the process, and although production has already started, it is unclear whether all the project's original objectives will be met.

SUMMARY

The Brazil-Mozambique's pharmaceutical factory experience illustrates positives as well as limitations of Brazil's unorthodox approach to health development cooperation, highlighting its contribution to pushing the boundaries of the debate on local production of pharmaceuticals in resource-poor settings.

摘要

背景

在近期经济发展以及国内抗击艾滋病毒/艾滋病取得成功的背景下,巴西正协助莫桑比克政府建立一家制药厂,作为其南南合作项目的一部分。直到最近,人们还普遍认为非洲的制药生产不可行或不可持续。本文探讨了这一合作的实际情况和发展历程,以阐明巴西在卫生领域发展合作的特点,旨在为关于非洲援助和药品本地生产的更广泛辩论提供经验教训。

讨论

我们表明,该项目过程漫长而复杂,涉及多个公共和私人合作伙伴,成本超过3400万美元。在此过程中也遇到了挫折,尽管生产已经开始,但尚不清楚该项目的所有最初目标是否能够实现。

总结

巴西-莫桑比克制药厂的经验既体现了巴西非传统卫生发展合作方式的积极方面,也凸显了其局限性,突出了其在推动资源匮乏地区药品本地生产辩论边界方面的贡献。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85fe/4190436/5b03e12e8fbb/12992_2014_70_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85fe/4190436/a0bd9e28dd58/12992_2014_70_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85fe/4190436/5b03e12e8fbb/12992_2014_70_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85fe/4190436/a0bd9e28dd58/12992_2014_70_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85fe/4190436/5b03e12e8fbb/12992_2014_70_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
On the margins of aid orthodoxy: the Brazil-Mozambique collaboration to produce essential medicines in Africa.在援助正统观念的边缘:巴西与莫桑比克在非洲生产基本药物的合作。
Global Health. 2014 Sep 25;10:70. doi: 10.1186/s12992-014-0070-z.
2
Changing global essential medicines norms to improve access to AIDS treatment: lessons from Brazil.改变全球基本药物规范以改善艾滋病治疗的可及性:来自巴西的经验教训
Glob Public Health. 2009;4(2):131-49. doi: 10.1080/17441690802684067.
3
TRIPS, pharmaceutical patents, and access to essential medicines: a long way from Seattle to Doha.《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》、药品专利与基本药物的获取:从西雅图到多哈的漫长之路
Chic J Int Law. 2002 Spring;3(1):27-46.
4
Expanding drug access in Brazil: lessons for Latin America and Canada.巴西扩大药品可及性:对拉丁美洲和加拿大的启示
Can J Public Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;97(6):I15-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03405239.
5
Local production of pharmaceuticals in Africa and access to essential medicines: 'urban bias' in access to imported medicines in Tanzania and its policy implications.非洲的药品本地生产和基本药物的获取:坦桑尼亚进口药品获取方面的“城市偏向”及其政策影响。
Global Health. 2014 Mar 10;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-10-12.
6
Brazil-Africa technical cooperation in health: what's its relevance to the post-Busan debate on 'aid effectiveness'?巴西-非洲卫生技术合作:它与后“釜山回合”有关援助有效性辩论有何关系?
Global Health. 2013 Jan 22;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-2.
7
Pharmaceutical Services and comprehensiveness 30 years after the advent of Brazil's Unified Health System.巴西统一卫生系统建立30年后的药学服务与全面性
Cien Saude Colet. 2018 Jun;23(6):1937-1949. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232018236.09022018.
8
Health-industry linkages for local health: reframing policies for African health system strengthening.卫生行业联系促进地方卫生:调整政策以加强非洲卫生系统。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 May 1;33(4):602-610. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy022.
9
The public production of medicines compared to the National Policy of Medicines and the burden of disease in Brazil.与巴西国家药品政策及疾病负担相比的药品公共生产
Cad Saude Publica. 2017 Sep 28;33(9):e00179815. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00179815.
10
Retail prices of essential drugs in Brazil: an international comparison.巴西基本药物的零售价格:一项国际比较。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2007 Aug;22(2):118-23. doi: 10.1590/s1020-49892007000700006.

引用本文的文献

1
South-South cooperation as a mechanism to strengthen public health services in Africa: experiences, challenges and a call for concerted action.南南合作作为加强非洲公共卫生服务的一种机制:经验、挑战及协同行动的呼吁。
Pan Afr Med J. 2017 Sep 15;28:40. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2017.28.40.12201. eCollection 2017.
2
Essential medicines for universal health coverage.全民健康覆盖的基本药物。
Lancet. 2017 Jan 28;389(10067):403-476. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31599-9. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Development assistance for health in Africa: are we telling the right story?非洲卫生发展援助:我们讲的故事对吗?
Bull World Health Organ. 2013 Jul 1;91(7):483-90. doi: 10.2471/BLT.12.115410. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
2
'BRICS without straw'? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies' influence in global health.“金砖无足轻重”?对新兴经济体在全球卫生中的影响力的系统文献回顾。
Global Health. 2013 Apr 15;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-15.
3
Brazil's engagement in health co-operation: what can it contribute to the global health debate?
巴西参与卫生合作:它能为全球卫生辩论做出什么贡献?
Health Policy Plan. 2014 Mar;29(2):266-70. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czt014. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
4
Brazil-Africa technical cooperation in health: what's its relevance to the post-Busan debate on 'aid effectiveness'?巴西-非洲卫生技术合作:它与后“釜山回合”有关援助有效性辩论有何关系?
Global Health. 2013 Jan 22;9:2. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-2.
5
Health conditions and health-policy innovations in Brazil: the way forward.巴西的健康状况和卫生政策创新:前进的道路。
Lancet. 2011 Jun 11;377(9782):2042-53. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60055-X. Epub 2011 May 9.
6
Brazil: structuring cooperation for health.巴西:构建卫生领域合作。
Lancet. 2011 May 21;377(9779):1722-3. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60354-1. Epub 2011 May 9.
7
Can NGOs regulate medicines markets? Social enterprise in wholesaling, and access to essential medicines.非政府组织能否规范药品市场?社会企业在药品批发领域的作用,以及获取基本药物的途径。
Global Health. 2011 Feb 28;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-7-4.
8
The UNITAID Patent Pool Initiative: Bringing Patents Together for the Common Good.国际药品采购机制专利池倡议:汇聚专利,造福大众。
Open AIDS J. 2010 Jan 19;4:37-40. doi: 10.2174/1874613601004020037.
9
Global health diplomacy: the need for new perspectives, strategic approaches and skills in global health.全球卫生外交:全球卫生领域对新视角、战略方法和技能的需求。
Bull World Health Organ. 2007 Mar;85(3):230-2. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.039222.
10
Examining the production costs of antiretroviral drugs.审查抗逆转录病毒药物的生产成本。
AIDS. 2006 Aug 22;20(13):1745-52. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000242821.67001.65.