Suppr超能文献

“金砖无足轻重”?对新兴经济体在全球卫生中的影响力的系统文献回顾。

'BRICS without straw'? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies' influence in global health.

机构信息

Global Public Health Unit, Social Policy, School of Social & Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH8 9LD, UK.

出版信息

Global Health. 2013 Apr 15;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since 2010, five newly emerging economies collectively known as 'BRICS' (Brazil, India, Russia, China and South Africa) have caught the imagination, and scholarly attention, of political scientists, economists and development specialists. The prospect of a unified geopolitical bloc, consciously seeking to re-frame international (and global) health development with a new set of ideas and values, has also, if belatedly, begun to attract the attention of the global health community. But what influence, if any, do the BRICS wield in global health, and, if they do wield influence, how has that influence been conceptualized and recorded in the literature?

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review in (March-December 2012) of documents retrieved from the databases EMBASE, PubMed/Medline, Global Health, and Google Scholar, and the websites of relevant international organisations, research institutions and philanthropic organisations. The results were synthesised using a framework of influence developed for the review from the political science literature.

RESULTS

Our initial search of databases and websites yielded 887 documents. Exclusion criteria narrowed the number of documents to 71 journal articles and 23 reports. Two researchers using an agreed set of inclusion criteria independently screened the 94 documents, leaving just 7 documents. We found just one document that provided sustained analysis of the BRICS' collective influence; the overwhelming tendency was to describe individual BRICS countries influence. Although influence was predominantly framed by BRICS countries' material capability, there were examples of institutional and ideational influence - particularly from Brazil. Individual BRICS countries were primarily 'opportunity seekers' and region mobilisers but with potential to become 'issue leaders' and region organisers.

CONCLUSION

Though small in number, the written output on BRICS influence in global health has increased significantly since a similar review conducted in 2010 found just one study. Whilst it may still be 'early days' for newly-emerging economies influence in global health to have matured, we argue that there is scope to further develop the concept of influence in global health, but also to better understand the ontology of groups of countries such as BRICS. The BRICS have made a number of important commitments towards reforming global health, but if they are to be more than a memorable acronym they need to start putting those collective commitments into action. Keywords BRICS, global health, influence, newly emerging economies, Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa.

摘要

背景

自 2010 年以来,五个新兴经济体被统称为“金砖国家”(巴西、印度、俄罗斯、中国和南非),引起了政治学家、经济学家和发展专家的想象和关注。一个有意识地寻求用一系列新的思想和价值观来重塑国际(和全球)卫生发展的统一地缘政治集团的前景,也已经——如果是姗姗来迟的话——开始引起全球卫生界的关注。但是,金砖国家在全球卫生方面有多大的影响力,如果有影响,它们的影响力在文献中是如何被概念化和记录的?

方法

我们对从 EMBASE、PubMed/Medline、全球卫生和 Google Scholar 数据库以及相关国际组织、研究机构和慈善组织的网站检索到的文件进行了系统的文献回顾。结果使用政治科学文献中为该综述开发的影响力框架进行了综合。

结果

我们对数据库和网站的初步搜索产生了 887 份文件。排除标准将文件数量缩小到 71 篇期刊文章和 23 份报告。两名研究人员使用一套商定的纳入标准独立筛选了 94 篇文件,只剩下 7 篇文件。我们只发现了一篇对金砖国家集体影响力进行持续分析的文件;压倒性的趋势是描述金砖国家个别国家的影响力。尽管影响力主要是通过金砖国家的物质能力来构建的,但也有机构和思想影响力的例子——特别是来自巴西。个别金砖国家主要是“机会寻求者”和区域动员者,但有可能成为“问题领导者”和区域组织者。

结论

尽管数量较少,但自 2010 年进行类似的审查发现只有一项研究以来,关于金砖国家在全球卫生中的影响力的书面产出显著增加。虽然新兴经济体在全球卫生中的影响力可能还处于“早期阶段”,尚未成熟,但我们认为,有必要进一步发展全球卫生影响力的概念,也有必要更好地理解金砖国家等国家集团的本体论。金砖国家已经做出了一些重要的改革全球卫生的承诺,但如果它们不仅仅是一个令人难忘的缩写,它们就需要开始将这些集体承诺付诸行动。关键词:金砖国家、全球卫生、影响力、新兴经济体、巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国、南非。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3eed/3637153/de33154e7346/1744-8603-9-15-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验