Manfredini Daniele, Stellini Edoardo, Marchese-Ragona Rosario, Guarda-Nardini Luca
Cranio. 2014 Oct;32(4):283-8. doi: 10.1179/2151090314Y.0000000008. Epub 2014 May 20.
The present study was designed to test the hypothesis that dental occlusion may have a role in mediating the effects of bruxism in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients. It aimed to answer the clinical research question: in a population of TMD patients with clinically diagnosed clenching-type bruxism, are the different TMD diagnoses associated with different occlusal features?
A total of 294 TMD patients (73% females, mean age 38·3±9·2 years) who were positive for a clinical diagnosis of clenching-type bruxism underwent an assessment in accordance with the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) axis I, as well as a recording of nine occlusal features. Statistical analyses were performed to test the null hypotheses that: (1) no differences existed between the patients with or without the various occlusal features as for the prevalence of the various single and combined RDC/TMD group diagnoses (single variable analysis), and (2) having any specific occlusal feature makes no difference in distinguishing within the RDC/TMD diagnoses (multiple variable analysis).
The distribution of the different combination of RDC/TMD axis I diagnoses was significantly different in patients with laterotrusive interferences with respect to those without such interferences (chi-square = 15·209; P = 0·033) as well as in patients with a slide from retruded contact position (RCP) to maximum intercuspation (MI) >2 mm with respect to those without such slide (chi-square = 4·029; P = 0·012) and in those with or without molar class asymmetry (chi-square = 17·438; P = 0·015). Multinomial regression analysis showed that the model including the various occlusal features account for 20·4% of the variance for RDC/TMD diagnoses (Nagelkerke R(2) = 0·204) and allowed the rejection of the null hypothesis that having such specific occlusal features makes no difference in distinguishing within the RDC/TMD diagnoses.
Within the limitations of this study, it can be suggested that in a population of patients with TMD and clinically-diagnosed clenching-type bruxism, the patterns of TMD diagnoses may be influenced, at least in part, by the presence of some features of dental occlusion, namely, slide RCP-MI, laterotrusive interferences, and molar asymmetry.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即牙合可能在颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者磨牙症的影响中起介导作用。其旨在回答临床研究问题:在临床诊断为紧咬型磨牙症的TMD患者群体中,不同的TMD诊断是否与不同的牙合特征相关?
共有294例临床诊断为紧咬型磨牙症阳性的TMD患者,根据颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准(RDC/TMD)轴I进行评估,并记录9项牙合特征。进行统计分析以检验以下零假设:(1)在患有或未患有各种牙合特征的患者之间,各种单一和联合的RDC/TMD组诊断的患病率不存在差异(单变量分析),以及(2)具有任何特定牙合特征在区分RDC/TMD诊断方面没有差异(多变量分析)。
在存在侧向干扰的患者与不存在此类干扰的患者之间,RDC/TMD轴I诊断的不同组合分布存在显著差异(卡方=15.209;P=0.033),在从后退接触位(RCP)到最大牙尖交错位(MI)滑动>2mm的患者与不存在此类滑动的患者之间(卡方=4.029;P=0.012),以及在存在或不存在磨牙类不对称的患者之间(卡方=17.438;P=0.015)。多项回归分析表明,包含各种牙合特征的模型占RDC/TMD诊断方差的20.4%(Nagelkerke R²=0.204),并允许拒绝具有此类特定牙合特征在区分RDC/TMD诊断方面没有差异的零假设。
在本研究的局限性内,可以提出,在患有TMD且临床诊断为紧咬型磨牙症的患者群体中,TMD诊断模式可能至少部分受到某些牙合特征的影响,即RCP-MI滑动、侧向干扰和磨牙不对称。