Ferrato Giacomo, Falisi Giovanni, Ierardo Gaetano, Polimeni Antonella, Di Paolo Carlo
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Italy.
Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017 Nov 8;8(2):79-88. doi: 10.11138/ads/2017.8.2.089. eCollection 2017 Apr-Jun.
Continuous technological innovation has provided the clinicians to access to a computerized device that can analyse the different characteristics of occlusal contacts. The purpose of this research was to use this device to study the occlusal forces comparing healthy subjects and TMD patients.
The study was conducted by following specific criteria to select participants; the sample was divided into two homogeneous groups: control group (CG) comprising healthy subjects, and dysfunctional group (DG) comprising TMD patients. The occlusal force analysis was performed using the computerized system T-Scan III V 5.20 T. The data were analysed with statistical methods.
The most significant differences emerged between the groups in the average occlusal load distribution and in the location of the centre of occlusal forces (COF). In particular, compared with the CG and the functional standard, reductions in the molar field forces on the second and first molars of 27% and 6.9%, respectively, were observed in the DG. The COF was located in the most forward position in TMD patients compared with healthy subjects.
Although the differences in the distribution of the occlusal forces and the location of the occlusal centre of gravity were significant, the relationship between occlusal contacts and TMD remains to be fully clarified. Further research is needed to investigate whether studying occlusal force distributions in both healthy subjects and TMD patients.
持续的技术创新使临床医生能够使用一种可分析咬合接触不同特征的计算机化设备。本研究的目的是使用该设备比较健康受试者和颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者的咬合力。
本研究按照特定标准选择参与者;样本分为两个同质组:包括健康受试者的对照组(CG)和包括TMD患者的功能障碍组(DG)。使用计算机化系统T-Scan III V 5.20 T进行咬合力分析。采用统计方法对数据进行分析。
两组之间在平均咬合负荷分布和咬合力中心(COF)位置方面出现了最显著的差异。特别是,与CG和功能标准相比,在DG中观察到第二和第一磨牙上的磨牙区力分别降低了27%和6.9%。与健康受试者相比,TMD患者的COF位于最靠前的位置。
尽管咬合力分布和咬合重心位置的差异显著,但咬合接触与TMD之间的关系仍有待充分阐明。需要进一步研究来调查在健康受试者和TMD患者中研究咬合力分布的情况。