Tan Cindy S E, Stevenson Philip G
Sir Albert Sakzewski Virus Research Centre, Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute and Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, University of Queensland and Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sir Albert Sakzewski Virus Research Centre, Queensland Children's Medical Research Institute and Australian Infectious Disease Research Centre, University of Queensland and Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
J Virol. 2014 Dec;88(24):14030-9. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02345-14. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
Viruses commonly infect the respiratory tract. Analyses of host defense have focused on the lungs and the respiratory epithelium. Spontaneously inhaled murid herpesvirus 4 (MuHV-4) and herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) instead infect the olfactory epithelium, where neuronal cilia are exposed to environmental antigens and provide a route across the epithelial mucus. We used MuHV-4 to define how B cells respond to virus replication in this less well-characterized site. Olfactory infection elicited generally weaker acute responses than lung infection, particularly in the spleen, reflecting slower viral replication and spread. Few virus-specific antibody-forming cells (AFCs) were found in the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT), a prominent response site for respiratory epithelial infection. Instead, they appeared first in the superficial cervical lymph nodes. The focus of the AFC response then moved to the spleen, matching the geography of virus dissemination. Little virus-specific IgA response was detected until later in the bone marrow. Neuroepithelial HSV-1 infection also elicited no significant AFC response in the NALT and a weak IgA response. Thus, olfactory herpesvirus infection differed immunologically from an infection of the adjacent respiratory epithelium. Poor IgA induction may help herpesviruses to transmit via long-term mucosal shedding.
Herpesviruses are widespread, persistent pathogens against which vaccines have had limited success. We need to understand better how they interact with host immunity. MuHV-4 and HSV-1 inhaled by alert mice infect the olfactory neuroepithelium, suggesting that this is a natural entry route. Its immunology is almost completely unknown. The antibody response to neuroepithelial herpesvirus infection started in the cervical lymph nodes, and unlike respiratory influenza virus infection, did not significantly involve the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue. MuHV-4 and HSV-1 infections also elicited little virus-specific IgA. Therefore, vaccine-induced IgA might provide a defense that herpesviruses are ill-equipped to meet.
病毒通常感染呼吸道。对宿主防御的分析主要集中在肺部和呼吸道上皮。而自发吸入的小鼠疱疹病毒4型(MuHV-4)和单纯疱疹病毒1型(HSV-1)反而感染嗅觉上皮,在那里神经元纤毛暴露于环境抗原并提供一条穿过上皮黏液的途径。我们利用MuHV-4来确定B细胞在这个特征较少的部位如何对病毒复制做出反应。嗅觉感染引发的急性反应通常比肺部感染弱,尤其是在脾脏,这反映出病毒复制和传播较慢。在鼻相关淋巴组织(NALT)中发现的病毒特异性抗体形成细胞(AFC)很少,而NALT是呼吸道上皮感染的一个主要反应部位。相反,它们首先出现在颈浅淋巴结。AFC反应的焦点随后转移到脾脏,与病毒传播的路径相匹配。直到后期在骨髓中才检测到少量病毒特异性IgA反应。神经上皮HSV-1感染在NALT中也未引发显著的AFC反应,且IgA反应较弱。因此,嗅觉疱疹病毒感染在免疫学上与相邻呼吸道上皮的感染不同。IgA诱导不佳可能有助于疱疹病毒通过长期黏膜脱落进行传播。
疱疹病毒是广泛存在的持续性病原体,针对它们的疫苗成效有限。我们需要更好地了解它们如何与宿主免疫相互作用。警觉小鼠吸入的MuHV-4和HSV-1感染嗅觉神经上皮,表明这是一条自然感染途径。其免疫学几乎完全未知。对神经上皮疱疹病毒感染的抗体反应始于颈淋巴结,并且与呼吸道流感病毒感染不同,鼻相关淋巴组织并未显著参与其中。MuHV-4和HSV-1感染也几乎未引发病毒特异性IgA。因此,疫苗诱导的IgA可能提供一种疱疹病毒难以应对的防御机制。