Biswas Sumi, Choudhary Prateek, Elias Sean C, Miura Kazutoyo, Milne Kathryn H, de Cassan Simone C, Collins Katharine A, Halstead Fenella D, Bliss Carly M, Ewer Katie J, Osier Faith H, Hodgson Susanne H, Duncan Christopher J A, O'Hara Geraldine A, Long Carole A, Hill Adrian V S, Draper Simon J
The Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, NIAID/NIH, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e107903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107903. eCollection 2014.
The development of protective vaccines against many difficult infectious pathogens will necessitate the induction of effective antibody responses. Here we assess humoral immune responses against two antigens from the blood-stage merozoite of the Plasmodium falciparum human malaria parasite--MSP1 and AMA1. These antigens were delivered to healthy malaria-naïve adult volunteers in Phase Ia clinical trials using recombinant replication-deficient viral vectors--ChAd63 to prime the immune response and MVA to boost. In subsequent Phase IIa clinical trials, immunized volunteers underwent controlled human malaria infection (CHMI) with P. falciparum to assess vaccine efficacy, whereby all but one volunteer developed low-density blood-stage parasitemia. Here we assess serum antibody responses against both the MSP1 and AMA1 antigens following i) ChAd63-MVA immunization, ii) immunization and CHMI, and iii) primary malaria exposure in the context of CHMI in unimmunized control volunteers. Responses were also assessed in a cohort of naturally-immune Kenyan adults to provide comparison with those induced by a lifetime of natural malaria exposure. Serum antibody responses against MSP1 and AMA1 were characterized in terms of i) total IgG responses before and after CHMI, ii) responses to allelic variants of MSP1 and AMA1, iii) functional growth inhibitory activity (GIA), iv) IgG avidity, and v) isotype responses (IgG1-4, IgA and IgM). These data provide the first in-depth assessment of the quality of adenovirus-MVA vaccine-induced antibody responses in humans, along with assessment of how these responses are modulated by subsequent low-density parasite exposure. Notable differences were observed in qualitative aspects of the human antibody responses against these malaria antigens depending on the means of their induction and/or exposure of the host to the malaria parasite. Given the continued clinical development of viral vectored vaccines for malaria and a range of other diseases targets, these data should help to guide further immuno-monitoring studies of vaccine-induced human antibody responses.
开发针对许多难以对付的感染性病原体的保护性疫苗将需要诱导有效的抗体反应。在此,我们评估了针对恶性疟原虫(人类疟原虫)血液阶段裂殖子的两种抗原——MSP1和AMA1的体液免疫反应。在Ia期临床试验中,使用重组复制缺陷型病毒载体(ChAd63引发免疫反应,MVA加强免疫)将这些抗原递送至未感染过疟疾的健康成年志愿者体内。在随后的IIa期临床试验中,免疫后的志愿者接受了恶性疟原虫的受控人体疟疾感染(CHMI)以评估疫苗效力,结果除一名志愿者外,其他所有志愿者均出现了低密度血液阶段寄生虫血症。在此,我们评估了在以下情况下针对MSP1和AMA1抗原的血清抗体反应:i)ChAd63-MVA免疫后;ii)免疫及CHMI后;iii)在未免疫的对照志愿者进行CHMI的情况下初次接触疟疾。还在一组具有自然免疫力的肯尼亚成年人中评估了反应,以便与终生自然接触疟疾所诱导产生的反应进行比较。针对MSP1和AMA1的血清抗体反应通过以下方面进行了表征:i)CHMI前后的总IgG反应;ii)对MSP1和AMA1等位基因变体的反应;iii)功能性生长抑制活性(GIA);iv)IgG亲和力;v)同种型反应(IgG1-4、IgA和IgM)。这些数据首次对腺病毒-MVA疫苗在人体内诱导产生的抗体反应质量进行了深入评估,同时评估了这些反应如何受到随后低密度寄生虫接触的调节。根据诱导方式和/或宿主接触疟原虫的情况,在针对这些疟疾抗原的人体抗体反应的定性方面观察到了显著差异。鉴于用于疟疾及一系列其他疾病靶点的病毒载体疫苗仍在持续进行临床开发,这些数据应有助于指导对疫苗诱导的人体抗体反应进行进一步的免疫监测研究。