Zebala John A, Mundell Alan, Messinger Linda, Griffin Craig E, Schuler Aaron D, Kahn Stuart J
Syntrix Biosystems, Inc., Auburn, Washington, United States of America.
Animal Dermatology Service, Edmonds, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108303. eCollection 2014.
Options are limited for patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) who do not respond to topical treatments. Antifolate therapy with systemic methotrexate improves the disease, but is associated with adverse effects. The investigational antifolate LD-aminopterin may offer improved safety. It is not known how antifolate dose and dosing frequency affect efficacy in AD, but a primary mechanism is thought to involve the antifolate-mediated accumulation of 5-aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide ribonucleotide (AICAR). However, recent in vitro studies indicate that AICAR increases then decreases as a function of antifolate concentration. To address this issue and understand how dosing affects antifolate efficacy in AD, we examined the efficacy and safety of different oral doses and schedules of LD-aminopterin in the canine model of AD.
This was a multi-center, double-blind trial involving 75 subjects with canine AD randomized to receive up to 12 weeks of placebo, once-weekly (0.007, 0.014, 0.021 mg/kg) or twice-weekly (0.007 mg/kg) LD-aminopterin. The primary efficacy outcome was the Global Score (GS), a composite of validated measures of disease severity and itch. GS improved in all once-weekly cohorts, with 0.014 mg/kg being optimal and significant (43%, P<0.01). The majority of improvement was seen by 8 weeks. In contrast, GS in the twice-weekly cohort was similar to placebo and worse than all once-weekly cohorts. Adverse events were similar across all treated cohorts and placebo.
Once-weekly LD-aminopterin was safe and efficacious in canine AD. Twice-weekly dosing negated efficacy despite having the same daily and weekly dose as effective once-weekly regimens. Optimal dosing in this homologue of human AD correlated with the concentration-selective accumulation of AICAR in vitro, consistent with AICAR mediating LD-aminopterin efficacy in AD.
对于对局部治疗无反应的特应性皮炎(AD)患者,治疗选择有限。全身性甲氨蝶呤的抗叶酸治疗可改善病情,但会产生不良反应。研究中的抗叶酸药物LD-氨基蝶呤可能具有更高的安全性。目前尚不清楚抗叶酸药物的剂量和给药频率如何影响AD的疗效,但其主要机制被认为涉及抗叶酸介导的5-氨基咪唑-4-甲酰胺核糖核苷酸(AICAR)的积累。然而,最近的体外研究表明,AICAR会随着抗叶酸浓度的变化先增加后减少。为了解决这个问题并了解给药方式如何影响AD中抗叶酸药物的疗效,我们在犬类AD模型中研究了不同口服剂量和给药方案的LD-氨基蝶呤的疗效和安全性。
这是一项多中心、双盲试验,75只患有犬类AD的受试动物被随机分配,接受长达12周的安慰剂、每周一次(0.007、0.014、0.021 mg/kg)或每周两次(0.007 mg/kg)的LD-氨基蝶呤治疗。主要疗效指标是综合评分(GS),它是疾病严重程度和瘙痒的有效测量指标的综合。所有每周一次给药组的GS均有所改善,其中0.014 mg/kg为最佳剂量且具有显著效果(改善43%,P<0.01)。大部分改善在8周时出现。相比之下,每周两次给药组的GS与安慰剂组相似,且比所有每周一次给药组更差。所有治疗组和安慰剂组的不良事件相似。
每周一次的LD-氨基蝶呤在犬类AD中安全有效。尽管每周两次给药的每日和每周剂量与有效的每周一次给药方案相同,但其疗效却消失了。在这种人类AD同源模型中的最佳给药剂量与体外AICAR的浓度选择性积累相关,这与AICAR介导LD-氨基蝶呤在AD中的疗效一致。