• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

修订版骨质疏松症知识测试的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of the revised Osteoporosis Knowledge Test.

作者信息

Qi Bing-Bing, Resnick Barbara, Nahm Eun-Shim

出版信息

J Nurs Meas. 2014;22(2):342-56. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.22.2.342.

DOI:10.1891/1061-3749.22.2.342
PMID:25255683
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the Osteoporosis Knowledge Test (OKT) revised to incorporate recent evidence-based recommendations for bone health.

METHODS

The revised OKT was tested with 866 participants (mean age = 62.8 years +/- 8.5 years) in an online bone health study.

RESULTS

Based on Rasch analysis, there was evidence of internal consistency with an item separation index of 12.68 and a reliability score of .98. The person separation index was 2.06 with a reliability score of .81. The INFIT and OUTFIT mean-square statistics for items on both subscales all demonstrated good fit ranging from 0.71 to 1.40, except for 2 items that had low OUTFIT statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The revised OKT provides sufficient reliability and construct validity.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在测试经修订以纳入近期基于证据的骨骼健康建议的骨质疏松症知识测试(OKT)的心理测量特性。

方法

在一项在线骨骼健康研究中,对866名参与者(平均年龄 = 62.8岁±8.5岁)进行了修订后的OKT测试。

结果

基于拉施分析,有证据表明其内部一致性良好,项目区分指数为12.68,信度得分为0.98。人员区分指数为2.06,信度得分为0.81。两个子量表上项目的INFIT和OUTFIT均方统计量均显示出良好的拟合度,范围从0.71到1.40,但有2个项目的OUTFIT统计量较低。

结论

修订后的OKT具有足够的信度和结构效度。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of the revised Osteoporosis Knowledge Test.修订版骨质疏松症知识测试的信度和效度
J Nurs Meas. 2014;22(2):342-56. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.22.2.342.
2
Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.ECOS-16问卷意大利语版本在患有骨质疏松症所致椎体骨折的绝经后女性中的效度和信度
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 May-Jun;25(3):390-403.
3
The development and psychometric properties of the bipolar disorders knowledge scale.双相障碍知识量表的编制及心理测量学特性。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:645-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.043. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: development and validation.屈光矫正对生活质量的影响(QIRC)问卷:编制与验证
Optom Vis Sci. 2004 Oct;81(10):769-77. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200410000-00009.
5
Revision of the Osteoporosis Knowledge Test: Reliability and Validity.骨质疏松症知识测试的修订:信度与效度
West J Nurs Res. 2015 Dec;37(12):1623-43. doi: 10.1177/0193945914537565. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
6
Theoretical model and Rasch analysis to develop a revised Foot Function Index.用于开发修订版足部功能指数的理论模型与拉施分析
Foot Ankle Int. 2006 Jul;27(7):519-27. doi: 10.1177/107110070602700707.
7
Psychometric properties of the painDETECT questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis: Rasch analysis and test-retest reliability.疼痛检测问卷在类风湿关节炎、银屑病关节炎和脊柱关节炎中的心理测量学特性:拉施分析与重测信度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 22;15(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0681-1.
8
Validity and Reliability of the Student Refractive Error and Eyeglasses Questionnaire-Revised Version in Myopic Children.近视儿童中《学生屈光不正与眼镜问卷修订版》的效度和信度
Optom Vis Sci. 2021 Nov 1;98(11):1287-1294. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001804.
9
Psychometric properties of Osteoporosis Knowledge Tool and self-management behaviours among Malaysian type 2 diabetic patients.骨质疏松症知识工具的心理测量特性及马来西亚 2 型糖尿病患者的自我管理行为。
J Community Health. 2013 Feb;38(1):95-105. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9586-4.
10
Linguistic validation of stigmatisation degree, self-esteem and knowledge questionnaire among asthma patients using Rasch analysis.使用拉施分析对哮喘患者的污名化程度、自尊和知识问卷进行语言验证。
J Asthma. 2017 Apr;54(3):318-324. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1208222. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Osteoporosis Awareness, Self-Efficacy and Health Beliefs Among Staff in an Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital: A Cross-Sectional Study.某妇产科医院工作人员对骨质疏松症的认知、自我效能感及健康信念:一项横断面研究
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Feb 4;18:339-351. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S491319. eCollection 2025.
2
Osteoporosis knowledge and beliefs in diabetic patients: a cross sectional study from Palestine.糖尿病患者的骨质疏松症知识与认知:来自巴勒斯坦的一项横断面研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Feb 7;19(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-1961-6.
3
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change of the "Osteoporosis and You" knowledge scale.
“骨质疏松症与你”知识量表的有效性、信度和反应变化能力。
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Dec;28(12):3379-3388. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4204-z. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
4
Osteoporosis Preventive Practice Between Veteran and Nonveteran Older Adults: Findings From Patient-Reported Data.退伍军人与非退伍军人老年人之间骨质疏松症的预防实践:患者报告数据的研究结果
Orthop Nurs. 2016 Nov/Dec;35(6):401-410. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000297.
5
The Effects of an Online Theory-Based Bone Health Program for Older Adults.一项基于理论的针对老年人的在线骨骼健康计划的效果
J Appl Gerontol. 2017 Sep;36(9):1117-1144. doi: 10.1177/0733464815617284. Epub 2015 Dec 16.