Battista Marco Johannes, Schmidt Marcus, Rieks Nicole, Sicking Isabel, Albrich Stefan, Eichbaum Michael, Koelbl Heinz, Mallmann Peter, Hoffmann Gerald, Steiner Eric
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Germany,
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Mar;141(3):555-62. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1834-9. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
In 2013, 2009 and 2006, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie evaluated the therapeutic approaches for endometrial carcinoma and the adherence to their guideline in Germany. Here, the adjuvant treatment decisions were presented.
A questionnaire was developed and sent to all 682 German gynecological departments in 2013 (775 in 2009 and 500 in 2006, respectively). The results of the questionnaires were compared with the recommendations of the guideline and with each other using Fisher's exact test.
Responses were available in 40.0 % in 2013, 33.3 % in 2009 and 35.8 % in 2006. Participants recommended external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 13 out of 16 requested stages and vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) in only 10 out of 16 requested stages as suggested by the guideline. Comparing the results of 2013 with 2009, less participants used EBRT and VBT in 7 out of 16 and in 6 out of 16 requested stages, respectively. Conversely, more participants offered adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in 2013 (90.4 %) compared to 61.9 % in 2009 (p < 0.001) and 48.8 % in 2006 (p < 0.001), respectively. However, the stage-adjusted recommendations of CT were not in line with the guideline in 11 out of 15 requested stages. In total, 77.3 % of the participants use a multiple drug schedule with a platinum and a taxane compound.
The results suggest non-adherence to the guideline concerning the stage-adjusted use of VBT and CT in endometrial carcinoma. These findings emphasize great uncertainties and the need of more clarifying trials. Furthermore, a shift from radiotherapy toward CT is observable.
2013年、2009年和2006年,德国妇科肿瘤协作组评估了子宫内膜癌的治疗方法及其对德国指南的遵循情况。在此展示辅助治疗决策。
设计了一份问卷,并于2013年发送给德国所有682个妇科科室(2009年为775个,2006年为500个)。使用Fisher精确检验将问卷结果与指南建议以及相互之间进行比较。
2013年的回复率为40.0%,2009年为33.3%,2006年为35.8%。参与者在16个要求的分期中有13个推荐了体外放射治疗(EBRT),而按照指南建议,在16个要求的分期中只有10个推荐了阴道近距离放射治疗(VBT)。将2013年与2009年的结果相比较,在16个要求的分期中分别有7个和6个分期中使用EBRT和VBT的参与者减少。相反,2013年提供辅助化疗(CT)的参与者更多(90.4%),而2009年为61.9%(p < 0.001),2006年为48.8%(p < 0.001)。然而,在15个要求的分期中有11个分期中CT的分期调整建议与指南不一致。总体而言,77.3%的参与者使用含铂和紫杉烷化合物的联合用药方案。
结果表明在子宫内膜癌VBT和CT的分期调整使用方面未遵循指南。这些发现强调了很大的不确定性以及进行更多明确试验的必要性。此外,可以观察到从放疗向CT的转变。