• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2008 - 2011年澳大利亚新南威尔士戒烟热线来电者概况。

A profile of callers to the New South Wales Quitline, Australia, 2008-2011.

作者信息

Grunseit Anne C, Ding Ding, Anderson Caroline, Crosbie Debra, Dunlop Sally, Bauman Adrian

机构信息

Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia;

Screening and Prevention, Cancer Institute NSW, Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia;

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 May;17(5):617-21. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu198. Epub 2014 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntu198
PMID:25257979
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

One population-level solution to smoking cessation are quitlines, telephone-based services to aid quitting. Monitoring the profile of quitline callers in a changing tobacco policy environment is important for informing future policy strategies and identifying target groups to improve the reach and impact of quitline services.

METHODS

De-identified data from 43,618 new callers to the New South Wales Quitline, Australia between January 2008 and October 2011 (inclusive) were extracted from the Quitline database. Regression analyses explored the effect of year of first call on the distribution of demographic and smoking-related variables.

RESULTS

Men calling the Quitline increased proportionately (prevalence ratio [PR] = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.03-1.08), but callers from non-major city areas fell (PR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.87-0.93) in 2011 versus 2008. The proportion of callers not working demonstrated a significant increasing linear trend (PR = 1.08, p < .001), although area-level socioeconomic status did not change. The proportions of new Quitline callers who had stopped smoking (relative to still smoking) (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.14-1.46) and who were classified as low nicotine dependent (vs. high nicotine dependent, RRR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.39-1.83) were higher in 2011 versus 2008. Proportionately, more callers nominated "money" as a motivation to quit in 2010 (PR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.49-1.66) and 2011 (PR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.62-1.79) compared with 2008.

CONCLUSIONS

Quitline callers showed decreasing tobacco consumption and dependence 2008 to 2011, but remained more addicted than the average NSW smoker. Clear effects of tobacco policy were shown, as money as a motivator increased dramatically in conjunction with increased tobacco taxation, highlighting the importance of promoting cessation services concurrent with policy change to capitalize on increased motivation to quit.

摘要

引言

戒烟热线是一种针对整个人口层面的戒烟解决方案,它是通过电话提供的戒烟辅助服务。在不断变化的烟草政策环境中监测戒烟热线来电者的情况,对于为未来的政策策略提供信息以及确定目标群体以提高戒烟热线服务的覆盖面和影响力至关重要。

方法

从澳大利亚新南威尔士州戒烟热线的数据库中提取了2008年1月至2011年10月(含)期间43618名新来电者的匿名数据。回归分析探讨了首次来电年份对人口统计学和吸烟相关变量分布的影响。

结果

与2008年相比,2011年拨打戒烟热线的男性比例有所增加(患病率比值[PR]=1.05,95%置信区间[CI]=1.03 - 1.08),但来自非主要城市地区的来电者比例下降(PR = 0.90,95% CI = 0.87 - 0.93)。未工作的来电者比例呈现出显著的线性上升趋势(PR = 1.08,p < 0.001),尽管地区层面的社会经济地位没有变化。与2008年相比,2011年已戒烟的新戒烟热线来电者比例(相对于仍在吸烟)(相对风险比[RRR]=1.29,95% CI = 1.14 - 1.46)以及被归类为低尼古丁依赖的来电者比例(相对于高尼古丁依赖,RRR = 1.60,95% CI = 1.39 - 1.83)更高。与2008年相比,2010年(PR = 1.58,95% CI = 1.49 - 1.66)和2011年(PR = 1.70,95% CI = 1.62 - 1.79)将“金钱”作为戒烟动机的来电者比例相对更高。

结论

2008年至2011年期间,戒烟热线来电者的烟草消费和依赖程度有所下降,但仍比新南威尔士州的普通吸烟者更容易上瘾。烟草政策产生了明显影响,随着烟草税的增加,金钱作为一种激励因素显著增加,这凸显了在政策变化的同时推广戒烟服务以利用增加的戒烟动机的重要性。

相似文献

1
A profile of callers to the New South Wales Quitline, Australia, 2008-2011.2008 - 2011年澳大利亚新南威尔士戒烟热线来电者概况。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 May;17(5):617-21. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu198. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
2
Increasing the reach of quitlines through active telephone recruitment: do cold-called smokers differ from quitline callers?通过主动电话招募扩大戒烟热线的服务范围:被随机呼叫的吸烟者与戒烟热线来电者有何不同?
Nicotine Tob Res. 2012 Dec;14(12):1488-93. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr317. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
3
[More] evidence to support oral health promotion services targeted to smokers calling tobacco quitlines in the United States.更多证据支持在美国向拨打戒烟热线的吸烟者提供口腔健康促进服务。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 11;13:336. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-336.
4
Impact of a brief telephone referral on quitline use, quit attempts and abstinence.简短电话转诊对戒烟热线使用、戒烟尝试和戒烟的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2015 Feb;30(1):134-9. doi: 10.1093/her/cyu041. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
5
American Indian/Alaska Native Smokers' Utilization of a Statewide Tobacco Quitline: Engagement and Quitting Behaviors From 2008 to 2018.美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民吸烟者对全州戒烟热线的利用:2008 年至 2018 年的参与和戒烟行为。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):219-226. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz205.
6
Feasibility and Early Outcomes of a Tailored Quitline Protocol for Smokers With Mental Health Conditions.针对心理健康状况吸烟者的定制戒烟热线协议的可行性和早期结果。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Apr 17;21(5):584-591. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz023.
7
Under-18 year old callers to New Zealand's Quitline.致电新西兰戒烟热线的18岁以下来电者。
N Z Med J. 2008 Apr 4;121(1271):24-32.
8
The Medi-Cal Incentives to Quit Smoking Project: Impact of Statewide Outreach Through Health Channels.美加州戒烟激励项目:通过健康渠道在全州范围内开展宣传的影响。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6 Suppl 2):S159-S169. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.031.
9
Electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) use during smoking cessation: a qualitative study of 40 Oklahoma quitline callers.电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)在戒烟中的使用:对俄克拉荷马州戒烟热线 40 名呼叫者的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 1;7(4):e013079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013079.
10
Impact of changes in home smoking bans on tobacco cessation among quitline callers.家中禁烟令变化对戒烟热线来电者戒烟的影响。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Jun 1;34(3):345-355. doi: 10.1093/her/cyz008.