• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠代食管切除术后的长期生活质量和饮食满意度

Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition.

作者信息

Greene Christina L, DeMeester Steven R, Augustin Florian, Worrell Stephanie G, Oh Daniel S, Hagen Jeffrey A, DeMeester Tom R

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1713-9; discussion 1719-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.088. Epub 2014 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.088
PMID:25258155
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The long-term outcome after colon interposition for esophageal reconstruction is not well documented. Our objective was to assess quality of life and alimentary satisfaction 10 or more years after colon interposition.

METHODS

Patients who had an esophagectomy that was reconstructed using a colon interposition before April 2003 were identified. Symptoms, alimentary satisfaction, and quality of life were assessed by telephone interview and questionnaires.

RESULTS

We identified 79 surviving patients, and follow-up was obtained in 63 (80%). The indication for esophagectomy was cancer in 45 patients and benign disease in 18. Vagal-sparing esophagectomy was performed in 48% of patients, en bloc in 44%, and transhiatal in 8%. Median follow-up was 13 years (range, 10 to 38 years). The median Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index score was 3 of 4 and results from the RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA) were at or above the published normal means in all categories. Most patients were free of dysphagia (89%), regurgitation (84%), and heartburn (84%). The most common postprandial symptom was early satiety (40%). The body mass index was within normal reference ranges in 90% of patients. Follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 30 patients at a median of 6 years showed no Barrett's metaplasia in the residual esophagus. Seven patients had a reoperation for colon redundancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term alimentary satisfaction and quality of life were excellent after colon interposition. Most patients were free of dysphagia and few needed revision for redundancy. These results should encourage the use of a colon interposition in patients expected to survive long-term after esophagectomy.

摘要

背景

结肠代食管重建术后的长期结局尚无充分记录。我们的目的是评估结肠代食管术后10年或更长时间的生活质量和饮食满意度。

方法

确定2003年4月前接受结肠代食管重建食管切除术的患者。通过电话访谈和问卷调查评估症状、饮食满意度和生活质量。

结果

我们确定了79名存活患者,其中63名(80%)获得了随访。食管切除术的指征为45例患者为癌症,18例为良性疾病。48%的患者行保留迷走神经的食管切除术,44%的患者行整块切除,8%的患者行经裂孔切除。中位随访时间为13年(范围10至38年)。胃肠道生活质量指数评分中位数为4分中的3分,兰德36项简短健康调查(兰德公司,加利福尼亚州圣莫尼卡)的所有类别结果均达到或高于公布的正常均值。大多数患者无吞咽困难(89%)、反流(84%)和烧心(84%)。最常见的餐后症状是早饱(40%)。90%的患者体重指数在正常参考范围内。30例患者中位随访6年时的食管胃十二指肠镜检查显示残余食管无巴雷特化生。7例患者因结肠冗长再次手术。

结论

结肠代食管术后长期饮食满意度和生活质量良好。大多数患者无吞咽困难,很少需要因冗长而进行修正。这些结果应鼓励在食管切除术后预期长期存活的患者中使用结肠代食管。

相似文献

1
Long-term quality of life and alimentary satisfaction after esophagectomy with colon interposition.结肠代食管切除术后的长期生活质量和饮食满意度
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;98(5):1713-9; discussion 1719-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.06.088. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
2
Alimentary satisfaction, gastrointestinal symptoms, and quality of life 10 or more years after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up.胃食管牵拉术后 10 年以上的摄食满足感、胃肠道症状和生活质量。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Mar;147(3):909-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.004. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
3
Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement.因食管癌置换术行结肠间置术后的生活质量
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Oct 1;88(1):32-38. doi: 10.1002/jso.20132.
4
A national audit of colonic interposition for esophageal replacement.
Dis Esophagus. 2017 May 1;30(5):1-10. doi: 10.1093/dote/dow003.
5
Esophageal reconstruction using the terminal ileum and right colon in esophageal cancer surgery.用末端回肠和右结肠进行食管癌手术中的食管重建。
Surg Today. 2012 Apr;42(4):342-50. doi: 10.1007/s00595-011-0103-7. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
6
Long-term outcome and quality of life after supercharged jejunal interposition for oesophageal replacement.食管置换采用带蒂空肠间置术后的长期结局及生活质量
Surgeon. 2015 Aug;13(4):187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Feb 4.
7
Short-segment colon interposition for end-stage achalasia.短节段结肠间置术治疗终末期贲门失弛缓症
Ann Thorac Surg. 2003 Nov;76(5):1706-10. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01019-1.
8
Colonic interposition vs. gastric pull-up after total esophagectomy.全食管切除术后结肠代食管术与胃上提术的比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Sep-Oct;8(6):675-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.03.007.
9
Colonic interposition and supercharge for esophageal reconstruction.结肠间置术及强化术用于食管重建
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006 Feb;391(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s00423-005-0010-8. Epub 2006 Jan 13.
10
Esophageal replacement by colon interposition with microvascular surgery for patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: the utility of superdrainage.采用结肠间置术联合微血管外科治疗胸段食管癌:超级引流的作用。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jan;26(1):50-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01327.x. Epub 2012 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
ASO Author Reflections: Balancing Survival and Quality of Life in Esophageal Reconstruction-A Nuanced Approach.ASO作者反思:食管重建中生存与生活质量的平衡——一种细致入微的方法
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Sep;32(9):6443-6444. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17596-z. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
Comparative Outcomes of Ileocolon Graft Versus Gastric Conduit Reconstruction in Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Survival, Quality of Life, and Perioperative Risks.食管癌回结肠移植与胃管道重建的比较结果:生存、生活质量和围手术期风险的倾向匹配分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17516-1.
3
Colorectal adenocarcinoma of the interposed colon after esophagectomy in infancy: a case report.
婴儿期食管切除术后间置结肠的结直肠癌:一例报告
J Surg Case Rep. 2024 Aug 23;2024(8):rjae516. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjae516. eCollection 2024 Aug.
4
Surgical options in retrosternal oesophageal reconstruction.胸内食管重建的手术选择。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Aug 3;409(1):238. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03433-6.
5
Colonic interposition in esophagectomy: an ACS-NSQIP study.食管癌切除术中结肠代食管术:一项美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)研究
Surg Endosc. 2023 Dec;37(12):9563-9571. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10420-3. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
6
Esophageal replacement when stomach conduit is unavailable: is colon the best option?当无法使用胃管道时进行食管置换:结肠是最佳选择吗?
Esophagus. 2023 Oct;20(4):769-770. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-01022-y. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
7
Dysphagia After Esophageal Replacement and Its Treatment.食管替换术后吞咽困难及其治疗。
Dysphagia. 2023 Oct;38(5):1323-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00455-023-10557-2. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
8
Surgical outcomes and quality of life assessment of esophagectomy for cancer with colon conduit via retrosternal route.经胸骨后路径行结肠管代食管术治疗食管癌的手术效果和生活质量评估。
Esophagus. 2023 Jul;20(3):435-444. doi: 10.1007/s10388-023-00984-3. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
9
Nutritional benefit of remnant gastric preservation in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radical esophagectomy and ileo-colon interposition.食管癌根治性切除加结肠间置术后残胃保留的营养优势。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01704-x.
10
Health-related quality of life after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer.食管癌患者食管切除术后的健康相关生活质量。
Esophagus. 2022 Jan;19(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s10388-021-00874-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.