Sundaram Aparna, Juarez Fatima, Ahiadeke Clement, Bankole Akinrinola, Blades Nakeisha
Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, Centro de Estudios Demográfico, Urbanos y Ambientales, El Colegio de Méico, Mexico and Institute for Statistical, Social, and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana
Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, Centro de Estudios Demográfico, Urbanos y Ambientales, El Colegio de Méico, Mexico and Institute for Statistical, Social, and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Research Division, Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY, USA, Centro de Estudios Demográfico, Urbanos y Ambientales, El Colegio de Méico, Mexico and Institute for Statistical, Social, and Economic Research, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana.
Health Policy Plan. 2015 Oct;30(8):1017-31. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu105. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
In 2006, in response to the high maternal mortality, driven largely by unsafe abortions, the government of Ghana, in partnership with other organizations, launched the reducing maternal mortality and morbidity (R3M) programme in seven districts in Greater Accra, Ashanti and Eastern, to improve comprehensive abortion care services. This article examines whether this intervention made a difference to the provision of safe abortion services and postabortion care (PAC). We also examine the role played by provider attitudes and knowledge of the abortion law, on providers with clinical training in service provision. Primary data on health care providers in Ghana, collected using a quasi-experimental design, were analysed using propensity score weighting. Apart from the treatment group, the sample included two controls: (1) Districts in Accra, Ashanti and Eastern, not exposed to the treatment; and (2) Districts from distant Brong Ahafo, also not exposed to the treatment. The findings show that providers in the treatment group are nearly 16 times as likely to provide safe abortions compared with their peers in Brong Ahafo, and ∼2.5 times as likely compared with providers in the other control group. R3M providers were also different from their peers in providing PAC. Associations between provider attitudes and knowledge of the law on both outcomes were either non-significant or inconsistent including for providers with clinical knowledge of abortion provision. Provider confidence however is strongly associated with service provision. We conclude that the R3M programme is helping safe abortion provision, with the differences being greater with control groups that are geographically distant, perhaps owing to lower contamination from movement of providers between facilities. Increasing provider confidence is key to improving both safe abortion provision and PAC.
2006年,为应对主要由不安全堕胎导致的高孕产妇死亡率,加纳政府与其他组织合作,在大阿克拉、阿散蒂和东部的七个地区启动了降低孕产妇死亡率和发病率(R3M)项目,以改善全面堕胎护理服务。本文探讨了这一干预措施是否对安全堕胎服务和堕胎后护理(PAC)的提供产生了影响。我们还研究了提供者态度和对堕胎法律的了解在接受临床服务提供培训的提供者中所起的作用。使用准实验设计收集的加纳医疗保健提供者的原始数据,采用倾向得分加权法进行分析。除治疗组外,样本包括两个对照组:(1)阿克拉、阿散蒂和东部未接受治疗的地区;(2)来自遥远的布朗阿哈福地区且也未接受治疗的地区。研究结果表明,与布朗阿哈福地区的同行相比,治疗组的提供者提供安全堕胎的可能性几乎高出16倍,与另一个对照组的提供者相比则高出约2.5倍。R3M项目的提供者在提供PAC方面也与同行不同。提供者态度与法律知识对这两个结果的关联要么不显著,要么不一致,包括对具有堕胎服务临床知识的提供者也是如此。然而,提供者的信心与服务提供密切相关。我们得出结论,R3M项目有助于提供安全堕胎服务,与地理上较远的对照组相比差异更大,这可能是由于设施间提供者流动造成的污染较少。提高提供者的信心是改善安全堕胎服务和PAC的关键。